Literature DB >> 20614213

The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size-weight illusion.

Gavin Buckingham1, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

When lifting objects of identical mass but different sizes, people perceive the smaller objects as weighing more than the larger ones (the 'size-weight' illusion, SWI). While individual's grip and load force rates are rapidly scaled to the objects' actual mass, the magnitude of the force used to lift these SWI-inducing objects is rarely discussed. Here, we show that participants continue to apply a greater loading force to a large SWI-inducing cube than to a small SWI cube, lift after lift. These differences in load force persisted long after initial errors in grip and load force rates had been corrected. Interestingly, participants who showed the largest illusion made the smallest errors in load force. This unexpected relationship suggests that the motor system is consistently biased toward the expectations of heaviness for a particular stimulus in a Bayesian fashion, and that this loading error is subsequently reduced by SWI perceptual errors in the opposite direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20614213     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2353-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness.

Authors:  D M Eagleman; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; A H Murray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement.

Authors:  R Granit
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  The cutaneous "rabbit": a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  F A Geldard; C E Sherrick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  When is a weight not illusory?

Authors:  H E Ross
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight.

Authors:  Erik C Chang; J Randall Flanagan; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Rotational inertia and multimodal heaviness perception.

Authors:  Matthew Streit; Kevin Shockley; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10
View more
  19 in total

1.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 3.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Distinct contributions of explicit and implicit memory processes to weight prediction when lifting objects and judging their weights: an aging study.

Authors:  Kevin M Trewartha; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Preserved Object Weight Processing after Bilateral Lateral Occipital Complex Lesions.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Desiree Holler; Elizabeth E Michelakakis; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Infants' prospective control during object manipulation in an uncertain environment.

Authors:  Janna M Gottwald; Gustaf Gredebäck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  The role of expectancies in the size-weight illusion: a review of theoretical and empirical arguments and a new explanation.

Authors:  Anton J M Dijker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

9.  Mass is all that matters in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Size matters: a single representation underlies our perceptions of heaviness in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.