Literature DB >> 26843597

Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Gavin Buckingham1, Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis2, Jonathan Cole3.   

Abstract

When lifting novel objects, individuals' fingertip forces are influenced by a variety of cues such as volume and apparent material. This means that heavy-looking objects tend to be lifted with more force than lighter-looking objects, even when they weigh the same amount as one another. Expectations about object weight based on visual appearance also influence how heavy an object feels when it is lifted. For instance, in the "size-weight illusion," small objects feel heavier than equally weighted large objects. Similarly, in the "material-weight illusion," objects that seem to be made from light-looking materials feel heavier than objects of the same weight that appear to be made from heavy-looking materials. In this study, we investigated these perceptual and sensorimotor effects in IW, an individual with peripheral deafferentation (i.e., a loss of tactile and proprioception feedback). We examined his perceptions of heaviness and fingertip force application over repeated lifts of objects that varied in size or material properties. Despite being able to report real weight differences, IW did not appear to experience the size- or material-weight illusions. Furthermore, he showed no evidence of sensorimotor prediction based on size and material cues. The results are discussed in the context of forward models and their possible influence on weight perception and fingertip force control.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deafferentation; grip force; load force; material-weight illusion; size-weight illusion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26843597      PMCID: PMC4869489          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00587.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  44 in total

1.  Role of the primary motor and dorsal premotor cortices in the anticipation of forces during object lifting.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Gabriel Leonard; Tomás Paus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Mathew S Grandy; David A Westwood
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evidence for stronger visuo-motor than visuo-proprioceptive conflict during mirror drawing performed by a deafferented subject and control subjects.

Authors:  R C Miall; J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grip forces isolated from knowledge about object properties following a left parietal lesion.

Authors:  Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force.

Authors:  Kelly J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Weight judgment. The discrimination capacity of a deafferented subject.

Authors:  M Fleury; C Bard; N Teasdale; J Paillard; J Cole; Y Lajoie; Y Lamarre
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  R R Ellis; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

9.  Preserved and impaired aspects of feed-forward grip force control after chronic somatosensory deafferentation.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; Z Elias; J D Cole; B M Quaney; D A Nowak
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight.

Authors:  Erik C Chang; J Randall Flanagan; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Heather R McGregor; Henry C H Pun; Gavin Buckingham; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real and illusory weight differences.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Johnny Parr; Greg Wood; Samuel Vine; Pan Dimitriou; Sarah Day
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Cody G Freeman; Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Examining Whether Semantic Cues Can Affect Felt Heaviness When Lifting Novel Objects.

Authors:  Caitlin Elisabeth Naylor; T J Power; Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-01-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.