Literature DB >> 7498383

Asymmetric control of bilateral isometric finger forces.

H Henningsen1, B Ende-Henningsen, A M Gordon.   

Abstract

We examined the ability to match the voluntary isometric finger flexion forces of the dominant and nondominant hand in humans, as well as the influence of unilateral visual feedback during this task. Right- and left-handed subjects were trained to produce a "low" force level (50 +/- 25 g) and a "high" force level (200 +/- 50 g) with the right and left index finger, separately. Following the training session, subjects were instructed to match the isometric forces of both fingers simultaneously within the required range (either low or high) so that they were perceived to be identical. The results showed an asymmetry, whereby greater forces were exerted with the index finger of the dominant hand. The asymmetry was independent of the subjects' maximum finger flexion strength. When unilateral visual feedback represented the force output of the dominant hand, the asymmetry was no longer present. In contrast, when it represented the force output of the nondominant hand, the asymmetry was not compensated. We hypothesize that these findings are the result of anatomical or physiological asymmetries inherent in the motor system controlling the production of force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7498383     DOI: 10.1007/bf00240966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich; T Prejean; R Grenda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Changes in perceived finger force produced by muscular contractions under isometric and anisometric conditions.

Authors:  N Mai; P Schreiber; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Perception of force and weight: theory and research.

Authors:  L A Jones
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Regional cerebral blood flow changes of cortical motor areas and prefrontal areas in humans related to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movement.

Authors:  R Kawashima; K Yamada; S Kinomura; T Yamaguchi; H Matsui; S Yoshioka; H Fukuda
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort.

Authors:  P E Roland; H Ladegaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; N Iwasaki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Changes in perceived heaviness and motor commands produced by cutaneous reflexes in man.

Authors:  A M Aniss; S C Gandevia; R J Milne
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Memory and coordination in bimanual isometric finger force production.

Authors:  Nick J Davis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Finger force perception during ipsilateral and contralateral force matching tasks.

Authors:  Woo-Hyung Park; Charles T Leonard; Sheng Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of laparoscopic instrument and finger on force perception: a first step towards laparoscopic force-skills training.

Authors:  M S Raghu Prasad; M Manivannan; S M Chandramohan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Contribution of tactile afferent information to the control of isometric finger forces.

Authors:  H Henningsen; B Ende-Henningsen; A M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Scaling analysis of bilateral hand tremor movements in essential tremor patients.

Authors:  S Blesic; J Maric; N Dragasevic; S Milanovic; V Kostic; Milos Ljubisavljevic
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight.

Authors:  Erik C Chang; J Randall Flanagan; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Upper Limb Asymmetry in the Sense of Effort Is Dependent on Force Level.

Authors:  Mark Mitchell; Bernard J Martin; Diane E Adamo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.