Literature DB >> 18443765

Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension.

Robert L Whitwell1, Lisa M Lambert, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

We examined whether or not conscious knowledge about the availability of visual feedback on an upcoming trial would influence the programming of a precision grip. Twenty healthy volunteers were asked to reach out and grasp objects under two viewing conditions: full visual feedback (closed loop) or no visual feedback (open loop). The two viewing conditions were presented in blocked, randomized, and alternating trial orders. Before each block of trials, participants were explicitly informed of the nature of the upcoming order of viewing conditions. Even though participants continued to scale their grip to the size of the goal objects which varied in size and distance, they opened their hand significantly wider when visual feedback was not available during movement execution. This difference was evident before peak grip aperture was reached, continued into the grip aperture closing phase, and presumably reflects the visuomotor system's ability to build in a margin of error to compensate for the absence of visual feedback. The difference in grip aperture between closed- and open-loop trials increased as a function of distance, which suggests that the visuomotor system can make use of visual feedback given enough time, even when that feedback is not anticipated. The difference in grip aperture between closed- and open-loop trials was larger when the two visual feedback conditions were blocked than when they were either randomized or alternated. Importantly, performance did not differ between the randomized and the alternating trial blocks. In other words, despite knowledge of the availability of visual feedback on an upcoming trial in the predictable alternating block, participants behaved no differently than they did on randomized trials. Taken together, these results suggest that motor planning tends to optimize performance largely on the basis of what has happened regularly in the past and cannot take full advantage of conscious knowledge of what will happen on a future occasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443765     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1395-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Barbara Mair; Josef Zihl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements.

Authors:  H Z Zelaznik; B Hawkins; L Kisselburgh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Martin Lemay; Linda M Squire; Yury P Shimansky; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements.

Authors:  D Elliott; F Allard
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-08

10.  The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight.

Authors:  Erik C Chang; J Randall Flanagan; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  30 in total

1.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Explicit knowledge about the availability of visual feedback affects grasping with the left but not the right hand.

Authors:  Rixin Tang; Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated according to movement duration in prehension.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Christopher J Worssam; Lewis C Meade; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement.

Authors:  James J Burkitt; Victoria Staite; Afrisa Yeung; Digby Elliott; James L Lyons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback.

Authors:  Prajith Sivakumar; Derek J Quinlan; Kevin M Stubbs; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.