Literature DB >> 11054927

Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.

Y Hu1, M A Goodale.   

Abstract

We carried out three experiments designed to compare the effects of relative and absolute size on manual prehension and manual estimates of perceived size. In each experiment, right-handed subjects were presented with two different-sized 3-D objects in a virtual display and were instructed to pick up or estimate the size of one of them. In Experiment 1, subjects were requested to pick up the smaller one of two virtual objects under one condition and the larger one under the other condition. In fact, the target object was identical on all trials; it was simply paired with a smaller object on some trials and a larger object on others. To provide veridical haptic feedback, a real object was positioned beneath a mirror at the same location as the virtual target object. In Experiment 2, one of the virtual objects was marked with a red dot on its top surface. From trial to trial, the marked object was paired with a larger, smaller, or same-sized object. Subjects were instructed to always pick up the marked object on each trial. In both Experiment 1 and 2, half the subjects were tested in delayed grasping with a 5-sec delay between viewing the objects and initiating the grasp, and half in real-time grasping without a delay. Using the same display of virtual objects as in Experiment 2, subjects in Experiment 3 were requested to estimate the size of the marked object using their index finger and thumb (i.e., they showed us how big the object looked to them). After estimating the target object's size, they picked it up. All subjects gave their estimates either immediately or after a delay. Recording of hand movements revealed that when subjects in Experiments 1 and 2 picked up the target object in real time, their grip aperture in flight was not significantly affected whether the object was accompanied by a larger object or a smaller one. When subjects picked up the target object after a delay, however, their grip aperture in flight was larger when the target object was accompanied by a smaller object than when it was accompanied by a larger object. A similar size-contrast effect was also observed in Experiment 3 in which subjects gave manual estimates of the perceived size of the target object. This perceptual effect was observed both when the estimates were given immediately and when they were given after a 5-sec delay. These results suggest that normal (real-time) visuomotor control relies on absolute metrics, whereas delayed grasping utilizes the same relative metrics used by conscious perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054927     DOI: 10.1162/089892900562462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  54 in total

1.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dorsal stream activation during retrieval of object size and shape.

Authors:  Robyn T Oliver; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

9.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.