Literature DB >> 8350123

Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

A M Gordon1, G Westling, K J Cole, R S Johansson.   

Abstract

1. While subjects lifted a variety of commonly handled objects of different shapes, weights, and densities, the isometric vertical lifting force opposing the object's weight was recorded from an analog weight scale, which was instrumented with high-stiffness strain gauge transducers. 2. The force output was scaled differently for the various objects from the first lift, before sensory information related to the object's weight was available. The force output was successfully specified from information in memory related to the weight of common objects, because only small changes in the force-rate profiles occurred across 10 consecutive lifts. This information was retrieved during a process related to visual identification of the target object. 3. The amount of practice necessary to appropriately scale the vertical lifting and grip (pinch) force was also studied when novel objects (equipped with force transducers at the grip surfaces) of different densities were encountered. The mass of a test object that subjects had not seen previously was adjusted to either 300 or 1,000 g by inserting an appropriate mass in the object's base without altering its appearance. This resulted in either a density that was in the range of most common objects (1.2 kg/l) or a density that was unusually high (4.0 kg/l). 4. Low vertical-lifting and grip-force rates were used initially with the high-density object, as if a lighter object had been expected. However, within the first few trials, the duration of the loading phase (period of isometric force increase before lift-off) was reduced by nearly 50% and the employed force-rate profiles were targeted for the weight of the object.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8350123     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.6.1789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  113 in total

1.  Predictions specify reactive control of individual digits in manipulation.

Authors:  Yukari Ohki; Benoni B Edin; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling; A Bäckström; J R Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Distributing vertical forces between the digits during gripping and lifting: the effects of rotating the hand versus rotating the object.

Authors:  Barbara M Quaney; Kelly J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Memory for fingertip forces: passive hand muscle vibration interferes with predictive grip force scaling.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Karin Rosenkranz; Joachim Hermsdörfer; John Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Context-dependent adaptation of visually-guided arm movements and vestibular eye movements: role of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Selective use of visual information signaling objects' center of mass for anticipatory control of manipulative fingertip forces.

Authors:  Iran Salimi; Wendy Frazier; Ralf Reilmann; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Prehension synergies in three dimensions.

Authors:  Jae Kun Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of carpal tunnel syndrome on adaptation of multi-digit forces to object texture.

Authors:  Mostafa Afifi; Marco Santello; Jamie A Johnston
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Stephen R Arnott; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grip-force responses to unanticipated object loading: load direction reveals body- and gravity-referenced intrinsic task variables.

Authors:  C Häger-Ross; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.