Literature DB >> 17909816

Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Paul Stolzmann1, Hans Scheffel, Thomas Schertler, Thomas Frauenfelder, Sebastian Leschka, Lars Husmann, Thomas G Flohr, Borut Marincek, Philipp A Kaufmann, Hatem Alkadhi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify radiation dose parameters of dual-source CT coronary angiography. Eighty patients underwent contrast-enhanced, retrospectively ECG-gated dual-source CT coronary angiography with heart rate-adapted ECG pulsing using two algorithms: In 40 patients, the tube current was reduced to 20% (A(min1)) of the normal tube current (A(max)) outside the pulsing window; in 40 patients tube current was reduced to 4% (A(min2)) of A(max). Mean CTDI(vol) in the A(min1) group was 45.1 +/- 3.6 mGy; the mean CTDI(vol) in the A(min2) group was 39.1 +/- 3.2 mGy, with CTDI(vol) in the A(min2) group being significantly reduced when compared to the A(min1) group (P < 0.001). A significant negative correlation was found between CTDI(vol) and heart rate in group A(min1) (r = -0.82, P < 0.001), whereas no correlation was found between CTDI(vol) and heart rate in group A(min2) (r = -0.066). Using the conversion coefficient for the chest, dual-source CT coronary angiography resulted in an estimated mean effective dose of 8.8 mSv in the A(min1) group and 7.8 mSv in the A(min2). Radiation exposure of dual-source CT coronary angiography using an ECG-pulsing protocol reducing the tube current to 20% significantly decreases with increasing heart rates, despite using wider pulsing windows at higher heart rates. When using a protocol with reduced tube current of 4%, the radiation dose is significantly lower, irrespective of the heart rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909816     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0786-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  [Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography].

Authors:  C Becker; M Schätzl; H Feist; A Bäuml; U J Schöpf; G Michalski; U Lechel; M Hengge; R Brüning; M Reiser
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1999-01

2.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure for 16-MDCT chest examinations.

Authors:  Marco Das; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Achim Stargardt; Claudia Weiss; Dirk-Alexander Sennst; Thomas G Flohr; Rolf W Günther; Joachim Ernst Wildberger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Thomas Flohr; Bernd Ohnesorge; Herbert Bruder; Heike Theessen; Meri Karakaya; Werner G Daniel; Werner Bautz; Willi A Kalender; Katharina Anders
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing.

Authors:  Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Andre Plass; Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Lars Husmann; Thomas G Flohr; Michele Genoni; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Dose reduction for cardiac CT using a registration-based approach.

Authors:  Marcin Wierzbicki; Gérard M Guiraudon; Douglas L Jones; Terry Peters
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography.

Authors:  Duncan R Coles; Mary A Smail; Ian S Negus; Peter Wilde; Martin Oberhoff; Karl R Karsch; Andreas Baumbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  70 in total

1.  Optimization of energy level for coronary angiography with dual-energy and dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Satoshi Okayama; Ayako Seno; Tsunenari Soeda; Yasuhiro Takami; Rika Kawakami; Satoshi Somekawa; Ken-Ichi Ishigami; Yukiji Takeda; Hiroyuki Kawata; Manabu Horii; Shiro Uemura; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Low-dose prospective ECG-triggering dual-source CT angiography in infants and children with complex congenital heart disease: first experience.

Authors:  Zhaoping Cheng; Ximing Wang; Yanhua Duan; Lebin Wu; Dawei Wu; Baoting Chao; Cheng Liu; Zhuodong Xu; Hongxin Li; Fei Liang; Jian Xu; Jiuhong Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol.

Authors:  R Gnannt; A Winklehner; R Goetti; B Schmidt; S Kollias; H Alkadhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model.

Authors:  B M Gramer; D Muenzel; V Leber; A-K von Thaden; H Feussner; A Schneider; M Vembar; N Soni; E J Rummeny; A M Huber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantification of radiation dose savings in cardiac computed tomography using prospectively triggered mode and ECG pulsing: a phantom study.

Authors:  Lukas Lehmkuhl; Dieter Gosch; H D Nagel; Patrick Stumpp; Thomas Kahn; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dose levels at coronary CT angiography--a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT.

Authors:  J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Tobias B Maurer; Rene Aschenbach; Huedayi Korkusuz; Thomas Lehnert; Simon Deseive; Hanns Ackermann; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jee Young Son; Sung Min Ko; Jin Woo Choi; Meong Gun Song; Hweung Kon Hwang; Sook Jin Lee; Joon-Won Kang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Bernhard A Herzog; Nina Burkhard; Fuminari Tatsugami; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Christophe A Wyss; Ulf Landmesser; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a "real-world" experience.

Authors:  E Maffei; A Palumbo; C Martini; A Cuttone; F Ugo; E Emiliano; A Menozzi; L Vignali; V Brambilla; P Coruzzi; A Weustink; N Mollet; D Ardissino; C Reverberi; G Crisi; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.