OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm for radiation dose, image quality (IQ), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: ECG-gated 256-slice MDCT dynamic MPI was performed in six pigs after subtotal balloon occlusion of one artery. Two 100 kVp protocols were compared: high dose (HD): 150 mAs; low dose (LD): 100 mAs. HD images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), LD images with FBP and different strengths of IR (L1, L4, and L7). IQ (5-point scale), SNR, and CNR (ischemic vs. normal myocardium) values derived from the HD (FBP) images and the different LD images were compared. RESULTS: Mean SNR values for myocardium were 16.3, 11.3, 13.1, 17.1, and 28.9 for the HD, LD (FBP), LD (L1), LD (L4), and LD (L7) reconstructions, respectively. Mean CNR values were 8.9, 6.3, 7.8, 9.3, and 12.8. IQ was scored as 4.6, 3.3, 4.4, 4.7, and 3.4, respectively. A significant loss of IQ was observed for the LD (L7) images compared to the HD (FBP) images (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Appropriate levels of iterative reconstruction can improve SNR and CNR, facilitating radiation dose savings in CT-MPI without influencing diagnostic quality. KEY POINTS: Iterative reconstruction (IR) can reduce radiation dose in myocardial perfusion CT. Our study also demonstrated improvements in image quality (noise, SNR, and CNR). Dynamic CT-MPI could help determine the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease. With dynamic CT MPI, myocardial blood flow can be determined quantitatively.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm for radiation dose, image quality (IQ), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: ECG-gated 256-slice MDCT dynamic MPI was performed in six pigs after subtotal balloon occlusion of one artery. Two 100 kVp protocols were compared: high dose (HD): 150 mAs; low dose (LD): 100 mAs. HD images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), LD images with FBP and different strengths of IR (L1, L4, and L7). IQ (5-point scale), SNR, and CNR (ischemic vs. normal myocardium) values derived from the HD (FBP) images and the different LD images were compared. RESULTS: Mean SNR values for myocardium were 16.3, 11.3, 13.1, 17.1, and 28.9 for the HD, LD (FBP), LD (L1), LD (L4), and LD (L7) reconstructions, respectively. Mean CNR values were 8.9, 6.3, 7.8, 9.3, and 12.8. IQ was scored as 4.6, 3.3, 4.4, 4.7, and 3.4, respectively. A significant loss of IQ was observed for the LD (L7) images compared to the HD (FBP) images (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Appropriate levels of iterative reconstruction can improve SNR and CNR, facilitating radiation dose savings in CT-MPI without influencing diagnostic quality. KEY POINTS: Iterative reconstruction (IR) can reduce radiation dose in myocardial perfusion CT. Our study also demonstrated improvements in image quality (noise, SNR, and CNR). Dynamic CT-MPI could help determine the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease. With dynamic CT MPI, myocardial blood flow can be determined quantitatively.
Authors: Dominik Morhard; Christina D Wirth; Gunther Fesl; Caroline Schmidt; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Birgit Ertl-Wagner Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Márcio Sommer Bittencourt; Bernhard Schmidt; Martin Seltmann; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Werner Günther Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Becker; Florian Schwarz; Roy P Marcus; Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Ron Blankstein; Udo Hoffmann; Wieland H Sommer; Verena S Hoffmann; Thorsten R C Johnson; Hans-Christoph R Becker; Bernd J Wintersperger; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Matthew D Gilman; Jiang Hsieh; Homer H Pien; Subba R Digumarthy; Jo-Anne O Shepard Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter B Noël; Thomas Köhler; Alexander A Fingerle; Kevin M Brown; Stanislav Zabic; Daniela Münzel; Bernhard Haller; Thomas Baum; Martin Henninger; Reinhard Meier; Ernst J Rummeny; Martin Dobritz Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2014-10-09
Authors: Lei Zhao; Fabian Plank; Moritz Kummann; Philipp Burghard; Andrea Klauser; Wolfgang Dichtl; Gudrun Feuchtner Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2015-04
Authors: S Feger; A Shaban; S Lukas; C Kendziorra; M Rief; E Zimmermann; M Dewey Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Brendan L Eck; Raymond F Muzic; Jacob Levi; Hao Wu; Rachid Fahmi; Yuemeng Li; Anas Fares; Mani Vembar; Amar Dhanantwari; Hiram G Bezerra; David L Wilson Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Xue Rui; Yannan Jin; Paul F FitzGerald; Mingye Wu; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Bruno De Man Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 3.609