Literature DB >> 22009020

Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Jee Young Son1, Sung Min Ko, Jin Woo Choi, Meong Gun Song, Hweung Kon Hwang, Sook Jin Lee, Joon-Won Kang.   

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) in the measurement of the ascending aorta (AA) diameter and compare the AA diameter in patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis. Eighty-eight consecutive patients (50 men, mean age 60.3 ± 13 year) with severe aortic stenosis (AS) underwent DSCT-CA before aortic valve surgery. Seventy-four of the 88 patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The internal diameter of AA was measured from early-systole with DSCT-CA and CMR by 2 radiologists independently at 4 levels (aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and tubular portion at the right pulmonary artery). The patients were divided in to 2 groups (BAV [n = 53]; TAV [n = 35]) according to operative findings. Patients with BAV were significantly younger than those with TAV (P = 0.0035). Inter-observer agreement of AA diameters at 4 levels with DSCT-CA and CMR was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.97). Also, the DSCT-CA and CMR measurements of the AA diameter strongly correlated (r = 0.871-0.976). Mean diameter of the AA by DSCT-CA was significantly larger in patients with BAV (34.4 ± 8.2 mm) as compared to those with TAV (30.6 ± 5.5 mm). The diameters at the sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and tubular portion were significantly larger in BAV than in TAV. Twenty-two of 53 (41.5%) patients with BAV and 2 of 35 (5.7%) patients with TAV had AA dilatation > 45 mm. DSCT-CA allows accurate assessment of the AA diameters in patients with severe AS. Patients with severe BAV stenosis had larger AA diameters and higher prevalence of AA dilatation > 45 mm as compared to those with severe TAV stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22009020     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9956-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kurt Debl; Behrus Djavidani; Johannes Seitz; Wolfgang Nitz; Franz-Xaver Schmid; Frank Muders; Stefan Buchner; Stefan Feuerbach; Günter Riegger; Andreas Luchner
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Comparison of feasibility and accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography versus computed tomography in patients with known ascending aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Gloria Tamborini; Claudia Agnese Galli; Anna Maltagliati; Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Carlo Quaglia; Giovanni Ballerini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions.

Authors:  M G Keane; S E Wiegers; T Plappert; A Pochettino; J E Bavaria; M G Sutton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Benjamin M Schaefer; Mark B Lewin; Karen K Stout; Peter H Byers; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Predictors of ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valve: a wide spectrum of disease expression.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Ciro Bancone; Cesare Quarto; Giovanni Dialetto; Franco E Covino; Michelangelo Scardone; Giuseppe Caianiello; Maurizio Cotrufo
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; David A Wood; Victoria Delgado; Joanne D Schuijf; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Frouke P L Lamers; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; John G Webb; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

8.  Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Shelton D Caruthers; Shiow Jiuan Lin; Peggy Brown; Mary P Watkins; Todd A Williams; Katherine A Lehr; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The aortic root: comparison of measurements from ECG-gated CT angiography with transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Iclal Ocak; Joan M Lacomis; Christopher R Deible; Karen Pealer; Yoav Parag; Friedrich Knollmann
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  R T Hahn; M J Roman; A H Mogtader; R B Devereux
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dual-Source Computed Tomography Evaluation of Children with Congenital Pulmonary Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Zhanguo Sun; Wenjian Xu; Shuran Huang; Yueqin Chen; Xiang Guo; Zhitao Shi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 0.212

2.  Bicuspid aortic valve annulus: assessment of geometry and size changes during the cardiac cycle as measured with a standardized method to define the annular plane.

Authors:  Sara Boccalini; Lidia R Bons; Allard T van den Hoven; Annemien E van den Bosch; Gabriel P Krestin; Jolien Roos-Hesselink; Ricardo P J Budde
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.