Literature DB >> 17902854

Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels.

Renata Sisto1, Arturo Moleti.   

Abstract

Cochlear latency has been evaluated in young adults by time-frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using the nonlinear acquisition mode at different levels of the click stimulus. Objective, even if model-dependent, estimates of cochlear tuning have been obtained from the otoacoustic latency estimates. Transmission-line cochlear models predict that the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission latency is dependent on the stimulus level, because the bandwidth of the cochlear filter (tuning) depends on the local cochlear excitation level due to nonlinear damping. The results of this study confirm the increase of tuning with increasing frequency and show clearly the decrease of latency and tuning with increasing stimulus level. This decrease is consistent with the expected relation between the slowing down of the traveling wave near the tonotopic place and the cochlear excitation amplitude predicted by cochlear models including nonlinear damping. More specifically, these results support the models in which nonlinear damping consists of a quadratic term and a constant positive term.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902854     DOI: 10.1121/1.2769981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rhythm judgments reveal a frequency asymmetry in the perception and neural coding of sound synchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

8.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

9.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

10.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.