Literature DB >> 23612740

Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Magdalena Wojtczak1, Jordan A Beim, Christophe Micheyl, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Cochlear hearing loss is often associated with broader tuning of the cochlear filters. Cochlear response latencies are dependent on the filter bandwidths, so hearing loss may affect the relationship between latencies across different characteristic frequencies. This prediction was tested by investigating the perception of synchrony between two tones exciting different regions of the cochlea in listeners with hearing loss. Subjective judgments of synchrony were compared with thresholds for asynchrony discrimination in a three-alternative forced-choice task. In contrast to earlier data from normal-hearing (NH) listeners, the synchronous-response functions obtained from the hearing-impaired (HI) listeners differed in patterns of symmetry and often had a very low peak (i.e., maximum proportion of "synchronous" responses). Also in contrast to data from NH listeners, the quantitative and qualitative correspondence between the data from the subjective and the forced-choice tasks was often poor. The results do not provide strong evidence for the influence of changes in cochlear mechanics on the perception of synchrony in HI listeners, and it remains possible that age, independent of hearing loss, plays an important role in temporal synchrony and asynchrony perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23612740      PMCID: PMC3705088          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0387-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  61 in total

1.  DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears.

Authors:  R Schoonhoven; V F Prijs; S Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination.

Authors:  Jennifer Lister; Joan Besing; Janet Koehnke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural gap duration discrimination in listeners with impaired hearing and normal hearing.

Authors:  J J Lister; J D Koehnke; J M Besing
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Derived-band auditory brain-stem response estimates of traveling wave velocity in humans: II. Subjects with noise-induced hearing loss and Meniére's disease.

Authors:  G S Donaldson; R A Ruth
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-06

7.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The influence of age and high-frequency hearing loss on sensitivity to temporal fine structure at low frequencies (L).

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Martin Stoev; Christian Füllgrabe; Kathryn Hopkins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.