Literature DB >> 15924936

Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Antje Nuthmann1, Ralf Engbert, Reinhold Kliegl.   

Abstract

Refixation probability during reading is lowest near the word center, suggestive of an optimal viewing position (OVP). Counterintuitively, fixation durations are largest at the OVP, a result called the inverted optimal viewing position (IOVP) effect [Vitu, McConkie, Kerr, & O'Regan, (2001). Vision Research 41, 3513-3533]. Current models of eye-movement control in reading fail to reproduce the IOVP effect. We propose a simple mechanism for generating this effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations due to saccadic errors. First, we propose an algorithm for estimating proportions of mislocated fixations from experimental data yielding a higher probability for mislocated fixations near word boundaries. Second, we assume that mislocated fixations trigger an immediate start of a new saccade program causing a decrease of associated durations. Thus, the IOVP effect could emerge as a result of a coupling between cognitive and oculomotor processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15924936     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  32 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Miao-Hsuan Yen; Jie-Li Tsai; Ovid J-L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

4.  Foveal processing and word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

5.  The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Suiping Wang; Hsuan-Chih Chen; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

Review 6.  Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Michael Dambacher; Olaf Dimigen; Arthur M Jacobs; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-14

7.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

8.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.