Literature DB >> 18505334

Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length.

Alexander Pollatsek1, Barbara J Juhasz, Erik D Reichle, Debra Machacek, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effects in sentence reading of varying the frequency and length of an adjective on (a) fixations on the adjective and (b) fixations on the following noun. The gaze duration on the adjective was longer for low frequency than for high frequency adjectives and longer for long adjectives than for short adjectives. This contrasted with the spillover effects: Gaze durations on the noun were longer when adjectives were low frequency but were actually shorter when the adjectives were long. The latter effect, which seems anomalous, can be explained by three mechanisms: (a) Fixations on the noun are less optimal after short adjectives because of less optimal targeting; (b) shorter adjectives are more difficult to process because they have more neighbors; and (c) prior fixations before skips are less advantageous places to extract parafoveal information. The viability of these hypotheses as explanations of this reverse length effect on the noun was examined in simulations using an updated version of the E-Z Reader model (A. Pollatsek, K. Reichle, & E. D. Rayner, 2006c; E. D. Reichle, A. Pollatsek, D. L. Fisher, & K. Rayner, 1998).

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18505334      PMCID: PMC2715992          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  39 in total

1.  Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.

Authors:  W Schroyens; F Vitu; M Brysbaert; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  The neural control of looking.

Authors:  R H Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Jane Ashby; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  The effect of the frequencies of three consecutive content words on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Denis Drieghe; Timothy J Slattery; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

7.  What guides a reader's eye movements?

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Moving attention through visual space.

Authors:  G L Shulman; R W Remington; J P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli.

Authors:  W Becker; R Jürgens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Simon P Liversedge; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

4.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: a systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading.

Authors:  Xingshan Li; Klinton Bicknell; Pingping Liu; Wei Wei; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-07-08

6.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Smith; Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-06-06

7.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

8.  The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Alexander Pollatsek; Adrian Staub; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

10.  A good tennis player does not lose matches. The effects of valence congruency in processing stance-argument pairs.

Authors:  Naomi Kamoen; Maria Baukje Johanna Mos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.