Literature DB >> 18980414

The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading.

Denis Drieghe1, Alexander Pollatsek, Adrian Staub, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

The distribution of landing positions and durations of first fixations in a region containing a noun preceded by either an article (e.g., the soldiers) or a high-frequency 3-letter word (e.g., all soldiers) were compared. Although there were fewer first fixations on the blank space between the high-frequency 3-letter word and the noun than on the surrounding letters (and the fixations on the blank space were shorter), this pattern did not occur when the noun was preceded by an article. R. Radach (1996) inferred from a similar experiment that did not manipulate the type of short word that 2 words could be processed as a perceptual unit during reading when the first word is a short word. As this different pattern of fixations is restricted to article-noun pairs, it indicates that word grouping does not occur purely on the basis of word length during reading; moreover, as the authors demonstrate, one can explain the observed patterns in both conditions more parsimoniously without adopting a word-grouping mechanism in eye movement control during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980414      PMCID: PMC2597395          DOI: 10.1037/a0013017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

5.  Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Erik D Reichle; Debra Machacek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  What guides a reader's eye movements?

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; M Mittau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

9.  Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  4 in total

1.  Investigating the Processing of Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from Eye-Movement Data.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Sung; Jih-Ho Cha; Jung-Yueh Tu; Ming-Da Wu; Wei-Chun Lin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

2.  Failure to detect function word repetitions and omissions in reading: Are eye movements to blame?

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sophia Dodge; Andrew L Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Skipping syntactically illegal the previews: The role of predictability.

Authors:  Matthew J Abbott; Bernhard Angele; Y Danbi Ahn; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Processing Preference Toward Object-Extracted Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese by L1 and L2 Speakers: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Sung; Jung-Yueh Tu; Jih-Ho Cha; Ming-Da Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.