Literature DB >> 16111733

Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions.

Sarah J White1, Simon P Liversedge.   

Abstract

Two experiments show that eye fixations land nearer to the beginning of misspelled than correctly spelled beginning words during sentence reading. The effect holds regardless of whether the previous word is easy (high frequency) or difficult (low frequency) to process. In Experiment 1, the misspelled words were directly fixated. In Experiment 2, a saccade contingent change technique was used such that the words were always correctly spelled once they were fixated. The results show that non-foveal orthography influences where words are first fixated regardless of foveal processing load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16111733     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Erik D Reichle; Xingshan Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The dynamic adjustment of saccades during Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements and simulations.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Lei Yu; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Visual information capture during fixations in reading for children and adults.

Authors:  Hazel I Blythe; Simon P Liversedge; Holly S S L Joseph; Sarah J White; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Erik D Reichle; Xingshan Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Eye movements reveal effects of visual content on eye guidance and lexical access during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.