Literature DB >> 17822011

Hardware assessment using the multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): a signal-detection study.

Jacob Y Hesterman1, Matthew A Kupinski, Eric Clarkson, Harrison H Barrett.   

Abstract

The multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R) is used for hardware assessment in objective, task-based signal detection studies in projection data. A phantom capable of generating multiple realizations of a random textured background is introduced. Measured backgrounds from this phantom are used along with simulated lumpy and uniform backgrounds to investigate signal-to-noise ratio as a function of exposure time. Results are shown to agree with theoretical predictions, exhibiting a power-law like dependence previously seen for studies performed either in simulation or without an imaging system, and help validate the use of simulated lumpy backgrounds in observer studies. A second study looks at signal-detection performance, measured by AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), in lumpy backgrounds for 20 M3R aperture combinations as a function of lump size and signal size. Observer performance reveals an improvement in AUC for certain ranges of signal and lump combinations through the use of multiplexed, multiple-pinhole apertures, indicating a need for task-specific aperture optimization. The channelized Hotelling observer is used with Laguerre-Gauss channels for both observer studies. Methods for selection of number of channels and channel width are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822011      PMCID: PMC2471875          DOI: 10.1118/1.2745920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

1.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: evaluation of five simple models.

Authors:  A B Watson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2000-01-03       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  A probabilistic model for the MRMC method, part 1: theoretical development.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  The multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): a novel small-animal SPECT system.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Lars R Furenlid; Donald W Wilson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

Authors:  H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background.

Authors:  K J Myers; J P Rolland; H H Barrett; R F Wagner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  A full-field modular gamma camera.

Authors:  T D Milster; J N Aarsvold; H H Barrett; A L Landesman; L S Mar; D D Patton; T J Roney; R K Rowe; R H Seacat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  10 in total

1.  Noise characteristics of heterodyne/homodyne frequency-domain measurements.

Authors:  Dongyel Kang; Matthew A Kupinski
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  G J Gang; D J Tward; J Lee; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  ADAPTIVE SMALL-ANIMAL SPECT/CT.

Authors:  L R Furenlid; J W Moore; M Freed; M A Kupinski; E Clarkson; Z Liu; D W Wilson; J M Woolfenden; H H Barrett
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2008

4.  Adaptive SPECT.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid; Melanie Freed; Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; Meredith K Whitaker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms.

Authors:  Subok Park; Robert Jennings; Haimo Liu; Aldo Badano; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  New Theoretical Results on Channelized Hotelling Observer Performance Estimation with Known Difference of Class Means.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  On Efficient Assessment of Image-Quality Metrics Based on Linear Model Observers.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Molecular Imaging in the College of Optical Sciences - An Overview of Two Decades of Instrumentation Development.

Authors:  Lars R Furenlid; Harrison H Barrett; H Bradford Barber; Eric W Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Zhonglin Liu; Gail D Stevenson; James M Woolfenden
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-08-17

10.  CT metal artifact reduction algorithms: Toward a framework for objective performance assessment.

Authors:  J Y Vaishnav; B Ghammraoui; M Leifer; R Zeng; L Jiang; K J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.