Literature DB >> 2370590

Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background.

K J Myers1, J P Rolland, H H Barrett, R F Wagner.   

Abstract

A method for optimizing the aperture size in emission imaging is presented that takes into account limitations due to the Poisson nature of the detected radiation stream as well as the conspicuity limitation imposed by a spatially varying background. System assessment is based on the calculated performance of two model observers: the best linear observer, also called the Hotelling observer, and the nonprewhitening matched-filter observer. The tasks are the detection of a Gaussian signal and the discrimination of a single from a double Gaussian signal. When the background is specified, detection is optimized by enlarging the aperture; an inhomogeneous background results in an optimum aperture size matched naturally to the signal. The discrimination task has a finite optimum aperture for a flat background; a nonuniform background drives the optimum toward still-finer resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2370590     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.7.001279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  22 in total

1.  A modified uniform Cramer-Rao bound for multiple pinhole aperture design.

Authors:  L J Meng; N H Clinthorne
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Harrison H Barrett; Donald W Wilson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  1996-01-01

3.  Anthropomorphic model observer performance in three-dimensional detection task for low-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Alexandre Ba; Miguel P Eckstein; Damien Racine; Julien G Ott; Francis Verdun; Sabine Kobbe-Schmidt; François O Bochud
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-12-29

4.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Mark D Parry; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Hardware assessment using the multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): a signal-detection study.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Adaptive SPECT.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid; Melanie Freed; Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; Meredith K Whitaker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Aperture optimization in emission imaging using ideal observers for joint detection and localization.

Authors:  Lili Zhou; Parmeshwar Khurd; Santosh Kulkarni; Anand Rangarajan; Gene Gindi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  List-mode likelihood.

Authors:  H H Barrett; T White; L C Parra
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  An evaluation of iterative reconstruction strategies based on mediastinal lesion detection using hybrid Ga-67 SPECT images.

Authors:  Nicholas F Pereira; Howard C Gifford; P Hendrik Pretorius; Mark Smyczynski; Robert Licho; Peter Schneider; Troy Farncombe; Michael A King
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sean D Rose; Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.