Literature DB >> 10232807

Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET.

R D Badawi1, M P Miller, D L Bailey, P K Marsden.   

Abstract

In positron emission tomography (PET), random coincidence events must be removed from the measured signal in order to obtain quantitatively accurate data. The most widely implemented technique for estimating the number of random coincidences on a particular line of response is the delayed coincidence channel method. Estimates obtained in this way are subject to Poisson noise, which then propagates into the final image when the estimates are subtracted from the prompt signal. However, this noise may be reduced if variance reduction techniques similar to those used in normalization of PET detectors are applied to the randoms estimates prior to use. We have investigated the effects of randoms variance reduction on noise-equivalent count (NEC) rates on a whole-body PET camera operating in 3D mode. NEC rates were calculated using a range of phantoms representative of situations that might be encountered clinically. We have also investigated the properties of three randoms variance reduction methods (based on algorithms previously used for normalization) in terms of their systematic accuracy and their variance reduction efficacy, both in phantom studies and in vivo. Those algorithms investigated that do not make assumptions about the spatial distribution of random coincidences give the best estimates of the randoms distribution. With the camera used, which has a limited axial extent (10.8 cm) and a large ring diameter (102 cm), the gains in image signal-to-noise ratio obtained with this technique ranged from approximately 5% to approximately 15%, depending on object size, activity distribution and the amount of activity in the field of view. Larger gains would be expected if this technique were to be employed on cameras of greater axial extent and smaller ring diameter.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232807     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Robert L Harrison; Charles W Stearns; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Nonrigid PET motion compensation in the lower abdomen using simultaneous tagged-MRI and PET imaging.

Authors:  B Guérin; S Cho; S Y Chun; X Zhu; N M Alpert; G El Fakhri; T Reese; C Catana
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Optimization-Based Image Reconstruction From Low-Count, List-Mode TOF-PET Data.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Sean Rose; Jinghan Ye; Amy E Perkins; Buxin Chen; Chien-Min Kao; Emil Y Sidky; Chi-Hua Tung; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Investigation of optimization-based reconstruction with an image-total-variation constraint in PET.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Jinghan Ye; Buxin Chen; Amy E Perkins; Sean Rose; Emil Y Sidky; Chien-Min Kao; Dan Xia; Chi-Hua Tung; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Analytic TOF PET reconstruction algorithm within DIRECT data partitioning framework.

Authors:  Samuel Matej; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Towards component-based validation of GATE: aspects of the coincidence processor.

Authors:  Eder R Moraes; Jonathan K Poon; Karthikayan Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Modelling Random Coincidences in Positron Emission Tomography by Using Singles and Prompts: A Comparison Study.

Authors:  Josep F Oliver; M Rafecas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Performance evaluation of a new high-sensitivity time-of-flight clinical PET/CT system.

Authors:  Li Huo; Nan Li; Heyu Wu; Wenjia Zhu; Haiqun Xing; Jiantao Ba; Tong Wang; Fang Li; Hui Zhang
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-12-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.