Literature DB >> 23000608

Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

Jan E Holly1, Sarah M Harmon.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Perceptual disturbances and motion sickness are often attributed to sensory conflict. We investigated several conditions: head movements in microgravity, periodic motions in 1-g, and locomotion with vestibular disorders. In every case, linear vectors such as linear and gravitational acceleration are crucial factors, as previously found for head movements in artificial gravity, and thus the importance of measuring linear vectors emerges as a common theme. By modeling the sensory conflict between the vestibular and somatosensory systems, we computed a measure of linear conflict known as the "Stretch Factor". We hypothesized that the motions with the greatest Stretch Factor would be the most provocative motions.
RESULTS: For head movements in microgravity, the Stretch Factor can explain why fast movements are more provocative than slow movements, and why pitch movements are more provocative than yaw movements. For off-vertical-axis rotation (OVAR) in 1-g, the Stretch Factor predicts that the most provocative frequency is higher than that for vertical linear oscillation (VLO). For example, the same sensor dynamics can predict a most provocative frequency around 0.2 Hz for VLO but 0.3 Hz for OVAR, solving a mystery of this experimentally observed discrepancy. Finally, we determined that certain sensory conflict perceptions reported by vestibular patients could be explained via mathematical simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23000608      PMCID: PMC3668558          DOI: 10.3233/VES-2012-0441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  48 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal processing of linear acceleration: primary afferent and central vestibular neuron responses.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; J D Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Individual differences in susceptibility to motion sickness among six Skylab astronauts.

Authors:  A Graybiel; E F Miller; J L Homick
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.413

3.  Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process.

Authors:  Gilles Reymond; Jacques Droulez; Andras Kemeny
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model.

Authors:  Jelte E Bos; Willem Bles
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Aasef G Shaikh; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Perceptual disturbances predicted in zero-g through three-dimensional modeling.

Authors:  Jan E Holly
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 7.  Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions.

Authors:  J E Bos; W Bles
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys.

Authors:  Keisuke Kushiro; Mingjia Dai; Mikhail Kunin; Sergei B Yakushin; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Vestibulo-ocular reflex in patients with Meniere's disease between attacks.

Authors:  K Funabiki; Y Naito; I Honjo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Eye movements during multi-axis whole-body rotations.

Authors:  Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Thomas Haslwanter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Asymmetries and three-dimensional features of vestibular cross-coupled stimuli illuminated through modeling.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; M Arjumand Masood; Chiran S Bhandari
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 2.  Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.