Literature DB >> 19208962

Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs.

Jan E Holly1, Arturs Vrublevskis, Lindsay E Carlson.   

Abstract

Illusory perceptions of motion and orientation arise during human centrifuge runs without vision. Asymmetries have been found between acceleration and deceleration, and between forward-facing and backward-facing runs. Perceived roll tilt has been studied extensively during upright fixed-carriage centrifuge runs, and other components have been studied to a lesser extent. Certain, but not all, perceptual asymmetries in acceleration-vs-deceleration and forward-vs-backward motion can be explained by existing analyses. The immediate acceleration-deceleration roll-tilt asymmetry can be explained by the three-dimensional physics of the external stimulus; in addition, longer-term data has been modeled in a standard way using physiological time constants. However, the standard modeling approach is shown in the present research to predict forward-vs-backward-facing symmetry in perceived roll tilt, contradicting experimental data, and to predict perceived sideways motion, rather than forward or backward motion, around a curve. The present work develops a different whole-motion-based model taking into account the three-dimensional form of perceived motion and orientation. This model predicts perceived forward or backward motion around a curve, and predicts additional asymmetries such as the forward-backward difference in roll tilt. This model is based upon many of the same principles as the standard model, but includes an additional concept of familiarity of motions as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19208962      PMCID: PMC2775489     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  45 in total

1.  Centrifugal force affects perception but not nystagmus in passive rotation.

Authors:  M L Mittelstaedt; W Jensen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process.

Authors:  Gilles Reymond; Jacques Droulez; Andras Kemeny
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Baselines for three-dimensional perception of combined linear and angular self-motion with changing rotational axis.

Authors:  J E Holly
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model.

Authors:  Jelte E Bos; Willem Bles
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys.

Authors:  Keisuke Kushiro; Mingjia Dai; Mikhail Kunin; Sergei B Yakushin; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Perception of two-dimensional, simulated ego-motion trajectories from optic flow.

Authors:  R J Bertin; I Israël; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements.

Authors:  L H Zupan; D M Merfeld; C Darlot
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  6 in total

1.  Head position modulates optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  V E Pettorossi; A Ferraresi; F M Botti; R Panichi; N H Barmack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The time constant of the somatogravic illusion.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; K N de Winkel; E L Groen; M Wentink; J E Bos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Asymmetries and three-dimensional features of vestibular cross-coupled stimuli illuminated through modeling.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; M Arjumand Masood; Chiran S Bhandari
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Differences between perception and eye movements during complex motions.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Saralin M Davis; Kelly E Sullivan
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Perception of rotation, path, and heading in circular trajectories.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Alessandro Nesti; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Paolo Pretto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.