Literature DB >> 28814635

Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.

A Pomante1, L P J Selen2, W P Medendorp2.   

Abstract

The vestibular system provides information for spatial orientation. However, this information is ambiguous: because the otoliths sense the gravitoinertial force, they cannot distinguish gravitational and inertial components. As a consequence, prolonged linear acceleration of the head can be interpreted as tilt, referred to as the somatogravic effect. Previous modeling work suggests that the brain disambiguates the otolith signal according to the rules of Bayesian inference, combining noisy canal cues with the a priori assumption that prolonged linear accelerations are unlikely. Within this modeling framework the noise of the vestibular signals affects the dynamic characteristics of the tilt percept during linear whole-body motion. To test this prediction, we devised a novel paradigm to psychometrically characterize the dynamic visual vertical-as a proxy for the tilt percept-during passive sinusoidal linear motion along the interaural axis (0.33 Hz motion frequency, 1.75 m/s2 peak acceleration, 80 cm displacement). While subjects (n=10) kept fixation on a central body-fixed light, a line was briefly flashed (5 ms) at different phases of the motion, the orientation of which had to be judged relative to gravity. Consistent with the model's prediction, subjects showed a phase-dependent modulation of the dynamic visual vertical, with a subject-specific phase shift with respect to the imposed acceleration signal. The magnitude of this modulation was smaller than predicted, suggesting a contribution of nonvestibular signals to the dynamic visual vertical. Despite their dampening effect, our findings may point to a link between the noise components in the vestibular system and the characteristics of dynamic visual vertical.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A fundamental question in neuroscience is how the brain processes vestibular signals to infer the orientation of the body and objects in space. We show that, under sinusoidal linear motion, systematic error patterns appear in the disambiguation of linear acceleration and spatial orientation. We discuss the dynamics of these illusory percepts in terms of a dynamic Bayesian model that combines uncertainty in the vestibular signals with priors based on the natural statistics of head motion.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian integration model; gravity; perception; somatogravic illusion; subjective visual vertical

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28814635      PMCID: PMC5646200          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00439.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

Review 1.  Characteristics of the VOR in response to linear acceleration.

Authors:  G D Paige; S H Seidman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; B S Mesland; W Bles
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Direction specific error patterns during continuous tracking of the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  S Keusch; B J M Hess; K Jaggi-Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Aasef G Shaikh; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multiple sensory cues underlying the perception of translation and path.

Authors:  N Au Yong; G D Paige; S H Seidman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration.

Authors:  S H Seidman; L Telford; G D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues.

Authors:  S H Seidman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.