Literature DB >> 20526711

Human discrimination of rotational velocities.

Robert M Mallery1, Osarenoma U Olomu, Rosalie M Uchanski, Valentin A Militchin, Timothy E Hullar.   

Abstract

Vestibular reflexes are critically important for stabilizing gaze and maintaining posture, but comparatively little is known about conscious perceptions of vestibular stimuli and how they may relate to balance function. We used psychophysical methods to determine the ability of normal subjects and a vestibular-deficient subject to discriminate among velocities of earth-vertical sinusoidal rotations. Discrimination thresholds in normal subjects rose from 2.26 deg/s at a peak velocity of 20 deg/s up to 5.16 deg/s at 150 deg/s. The relationship between threshold and peak angular velocity was well described by the power law function DeltaI = 0.88I(0.37), where I is the magnitude of the stimulus and DeltaI is the discrimination threshold. The subject with bilateral vestibular hypofunction had thresholds more than an order of magnitude worse than normals. The performance of normal subjects is much better than that predicted by Weber's Law, which states that discrimination thresholds increase proportionally with stimulus magnitude (i.e., DeltaI/I = C, where C is the "Weber fraction"). This represents a remarkable exception to other sensory systems and may reflect the vestibular system's ability to stabilize gaze and maintain posture even at high stimulus intensities. Quantifying this relationship may help elucidate the role of higher-level processes in maintaining balance and provide information to diagnose and guide therapy of patients with central causes for imbalance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526711      PMCID: PMC2939372          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2288-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

Review 1.  The vestibular system.

Authors:  Brian L Day; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Multiple sensory cues underlying the perception of translation and path.

Authors:  N Au Yong; G D Paige; S H Seidman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perception of self motion during and after passive rotation of the body around an earth-vertical axis.

Authors:  N Sinha; N Zaher; A G Shaikh; A G Lasker; D S Zee; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; S J Bolanowski; R T Verrillo; D J Arpajian; T F Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Magnitude estimation of angular velocity during passive rotation.

Authors:  J H Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-08

8.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues.

Authors:  S H Seidman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perceptual and nystagmic thresholds of vestibular function in yaw.

Authors:  B M Seemungal; I A Gunaratne; I O Fleming; M A Gresty; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Thresholds for perception of direction of linear acceleration as a possible evaluation of the otolith function.

Authors:  H Kingma
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2005-06-22
View more
  40 in total

1.  Frequency dependence of vestibuloocular reflex thresholds.

Authors:  Csilla Haburcakova; Richard F Lewis; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A distributed, dynamic, parallel computational model: the role of noise in velocity storage.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Human discrimination of translational accelerations.

Authors:  Amir R Naseri; Peter R Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Directional asymmetries and age effects in human self-motion perception.

Authors:  Rachel E Roditi; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-09

5.  The statistics of the vestibular input experienced during natural self-motion differ between rodents and primates.

Authors:  Jérome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Clinical testing of otolith function: perceptual thresholds and myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Tatiana Bremova; Olympia Kremmyda; Michael Strupp; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12

7.  Whole body motion-detection tasks can yield much lower thresholds than direction-recognition tasks: implications for the role of vibration.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Vestibular labyrinth contributions to human whole-body motion discrimination.

Authors:  Yulia Valko; Richard F Lewis; Adrian J Priesol; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Temporal binding of auditory and rotational stimuli.

Authors:  Mark C Sanders; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Meghan M Hiss; Rosalie M Uchanski; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gain and phase of perceived virtual rotation evoked by electrical vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Brandon G Rasman; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.