Literature DB >> 17492289

Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.

Claus Koelblinger1, Mathias Prokop, Michael Weber, Johannes Sailer, Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu, Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of matrix size (4-K versus 2-K) in digital storage phosphor chest radiographs on image quality and on the detection of CT-proven thoracic abnormalities. In 85 patients who underwent a CT of the thorax, we obtained two additional posteroanterior storage phosphor chest radiographs, one with a matrix size of 3,520x4,280 (=4-K) and the other with a matrix size of 1,760x2,140 (=2-K). Acquisition, processing and presentation parameters were identical for all radiographs. Two radiologists evaluated the presence of mediastinal, pleural, and pulmonary abnormalities on hard copies of the radiographs, applying ROC analysis. In addition, four radiologists were asked to subjectively rank differences in image quality and to assess the demarcation of anatomic landmarks comparing the images in a blinded side-by-side manner. These data were analyzed using a two-sided binomial test with a significance level of P<0.05. Both tests, the ROC analysis of the detection performance and the binomial test of the subjective quality ratings, did not reveal significant differences between the two matrix sizes. Compared to 2-K radiographs, 4-K storage phosphor chest radiographs do not provide superior detection performance or image quality when evaluated in identical hard copy formats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17492289     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0650-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Mireille V Boot; Bart J A Mertens; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  C M Schaefer; M Prokop; J W Oestmann; W Wiesmann; B Haubitz; A Meschede; S Reichelt; E Schirg; H S Stender; M Galanski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Total digital radiology department: spatial resolution requirements.

Authors:  G W Seeley; H D Fisher; M O Stempski; M Borgstrom; J Bjelland; M P Capp
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.

Authors:  A R Cowen; A Workman; J S Price
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum.

Authors:  M L Giger; K Doi; C E Metz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.

Authors:  W F Good; D Gur; J H Feist; F L Thaete; C R Fuhrman; C A Britton; B S Slasky
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast.

Authors:  M L Giger; K Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.

Authors:  Takashi Ueguchi; Takeshi Johkoh; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Osamu Honda; Naoki Mihara; Seiki Hamada; Sachiko Murai; Yuji Ogata; Mitsuhiro Matsumoto; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2005-05

9.  Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.

Authors:  C M Schaefer; R Greene; J W Oestmann; D A Hall; H J Llewellyn; K A McCarthy; E R Pile-Spellman; J R Rubens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.

Authors:  S P Miró; A N Leung; G D Rubin; Y H Choi; S T Kee; R E Mindelzun; P Stark; L Wexler; S K Plevritis; B J Betts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.