Literature DB >> 8495288

Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.

A R Cowen1, A Workman, J S Price.   

Abstract

Currently photostimulable phosphor computed radiography (PPCR) promises to be the digital X-ray image acquisition technology of choice for classical radiography (i.e. X-ray examinations of natural anatomy). For the last two years we have been carrying out a physical evaluation of modern PPCR technology and some of our findings relevant to general radiographic applications are reviewed here. Topics covered include the function of the auto-reader system and the reliability of image reproduction, the radiation exposure requirement and physical image quality. The latter is based upon both objective and subjective measures of image quality. These studies have yielded a favourable comparison of the image quality of modern PPCR technology with that of medium-speed and fast radiographic screen-film combinations. The major advantages of PPCR appear to be the maintenance of high imaging efficiency (DQE) over a much wider range of signal levels than film and consistent image acquisition and presentation independent of exposure level. In general radiographic applications no major limitations due to the comparatively modest limiting spatial resolution of PPCR [maximum limiting resolution = 5 line-pair mm-1] have been experienced. Digital image enhancement is a central element of PPCR image reproduction. The authors believe that advances in image enhancement algorithms remain a potential area for further improving the presented quality of PPCR images.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8495288     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-784-332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

1.  Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion.

Authors:  Steven Don
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05

2.  Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.

Authors:  Claus Koelblinger; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.

Authors:  R D Müller; M Voss; H Hirche; B Buddenbrock; V John; E Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Support line and tube visibility in chest examinations using computed radiography.

Authors:  W Huda; C J Belden; L A Webb; C K Palmer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Verification of prostate treatment setup using computed radiography for portal imaging.

Authors:  Richard Whittington; Peter Bloch; Della Hutchinson; Bengt E Bjarngard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Z F Lu; E L Nickoloff; J C So; A K Dutta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.