Literature DB >> 16132918

Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Wouter J H Veldkamp1, Lucia J M Kroft, Mireille V Boot, Bart J A Mertens, Jacob Geleijns.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess contrast-detail performance and effective dose of eight different digital chest radiography systems. Digital chest radiography systems from different manufacturers were included: one storage phosphor system, one selenium-coated drum system, and six direct readout systems including four thin-film transistor (TFT) systems and two charge-coupled device (CCD) systems. For measuring image quality, a contrast-detail test object was used in combination with a phantom that simulates the primary and scatter transmission through lung fields (LucAl). Six observers judged phantom images of each modality by soft-copy reading in a four-alternative-forced-choice experiment. The entrance dose was also measured, and the effective dose was calculated for an average patient. Contrast-detail curves were constructed from the observer data. The blocked two-way ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Significant difference in contrast-detail performance was found between the systems. Best contrast-detail performance was shown by a CCD system with slot-scan technology, and the selenium-coated drum system was compared to the other six systems (p values <or=0.003). Calculated effective dose varied between 0.010 mSv and 0.032 mSv. Significant differences in contrast-detail performance and effective dose levels were found between different digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132918     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2887-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

1.  Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.

Authors:  J M Goo; J G Im; J H Kim; J B Seo; T S Kim; S J Shine; W Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD-based system for digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Magnus Båth; Patrik Sund; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Authors:  K Awai; M Komi; S Hori
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Robert S Saunders; Joseph Y Lo; James T Dobbins; Jonathan L Jesneck; Carey E Floyd; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quality analysis of DSA equipment.

Authors:  M A Thijssen; H O Thijssen; J L Merx; M P van Woensel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Digital selenium radiography: anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study.

Authors:  T M Bernhardt; U Rapp-Bernhardt; T Hausmann; G Reichel; U W Krause; W Doehring
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; Kris Bonnarens; An De Hauwere; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations.

Authors:  B J Conway; P F Butler; J E Duff; T R Fewell; R E Gross; R J Jennings; G H Koustenis; J L McCrohan; F G Rueter; C K Showalter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  8 in total

1.  Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.

Authors:  Claus Koelblinger; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Jan Pieter A van Delft; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

Authors:  Sadeq Al-Murshedi; Peter Hogg; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Radiologic and near-infrared/optical spectroscopic imaging: where is the synergy?

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Frederic Leblond; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Introduction of a New Parameter for Evaluation of Digital Radiography System Performance.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Choopani; Ali Chaparian
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2020-07-03

6.  Assessment of patient dose and optimization levels in chest and abdomen CR examinations at referral hospitals in Tanzania.

Authors:  A O Masoud; W E Muhogora; P K Msaki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Correlation of clinical and physical-technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  An De Crop; Peter Smeets; Tom Van Hoof; Merel Vergauwen; Tom Dewaele; Mathias Van Borsel; Eric Achten; Koenraad Verstraete; Katharina D'Herde; Hubert Thierens; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 1.930

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.