Literature DB >> 23281778

Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Sara Guediche1, Caden Salvata, Sheila E Blumstein.   

Abstract

Listeners' perception of acoustically presented speech is constrained by many different sources of information that arise from other sensory modalities and from more abstract higher-level language context. An open question is how perceptual processes are influenced by and interact with these other sources of information. In this study, we use fMRI to examine the effect of a prior sentence fragment meaning on the categorization of two possible target words that differ in an acoustic phonetic feature of the initial consonant, VOT. Specifically, we manipulate the bias of the sentence context (biased, neutral) and the target type (ambiguous, unambiguous). Our results show that an interaction between these two factors emerged in a cluster in temporal cortex encompassing the left middle temporal gyrus and the superior temporal gyrus. The locus and pattern of these interactions support an interactive view of speech processing and suggest that both the quality of the input and the potential bias of the context together interact and modulate neural activation patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23281778      PMCID: PMC3612392          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  59 in total

Review 1.  Connectionist modeling of speech perception.

Authors:  A Protopapas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Representation of speech categories in the primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joji Tsunada; Jung Hoon Lee; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization.

Authors:  R A Fox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Sheila E Blumstein; Edward Walsh; James Eliassen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-08

6.  Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates.

Authors:  David W Gow; Jennifer A Segawa; Seppo P Ahlfors; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.

Authors:  Nina F Dronkers; David P Wilkins; Robert D Van Valin; Brenda B Redfern; Jeri J Jaeger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

8.  Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Jonathan E Peelle; Robert P Carlyon; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James M McQueen; Dennis Norris; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Segregation of vowels and consonants in human auditory cortex: evidence for distributed hierarchical organization.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Amber M Leaver; John Vanmeter; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-24
View more
  11 in total

1.  An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Megan Reilly; Carolina Santiago; Patryk Laurent; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data.

Authors:  David W Gow; Bruna B Olson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; James S Magnuson; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Sentence predictability modulates cortical response to phonetic ambiguity.

Authors:  Hannah Mechtenberg; Xin Xie; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Lexical Influences on Categorical Speech Perception Are Driven by a Temporoparietal Circuit.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Claire Pearson; Ashleigh Harrison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.

Authors:  T M Vanessa Chan; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-08

10.  Speech perception under adverse conditions: insights from behavioral, computational, and neuroscience research.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Sheila E Blumstein; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.