Literature DB >> 15869347

Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Matthew H Davis1, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Alexis Hervais-Adelman, Karen Taylor, Carolyn McGettigan.   

Abstract

Speech comprehension is resistant to acoustic distortion in the input, reflecting listeners' ability to adjust perceptual processes to match the speech input. For noise-vocoded sentences, a manipulation that removes spectral detail from speech, listeners' reporting improved from near 0% to 70% correct over 30 sentences (Experiment 1). Learning was enhanced if listeners heard distorted sentences while they knew the identity of the undistorted target (Experiments 2 and 3). Learning was absent when listeners were trained with nonword sentences (Experiments 4 and 5), although the meaning of the training sentences did not affect learning (Experiment 5). Perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech depends on higher level information, consistent with top-down, lexically driven learning. Similar processes may facilitate comprehension of speech in an unfamiliar accent or following cochlear implantation. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869347     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  156 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.

Authors:  Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

3.  The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contribution of writing to reading: Dissociation between cognitive and motor process in the left dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Chotiga Pattamadilok; Aurélie Ponz; Samuel Planton; Mireille Bonnard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James L McClelland; Daniel Mirman; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.