Literature DB >> 17453308

Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Virginia Best1, Erol J Ozmeral, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

In auditory scenes containing many similar sound sources, sorting of acoustic information into streams becomes difficult, which can lead to disruptions in the identification of behaviorally relevant targets. This study investigated the benefit of providing simple visual cues for when and/or where a target would occur in a complex acoustic mixture. Importantly, the visual cues provided no information about the target content. In separate experiments, human subjects either identified learned birdsongs in the presence of a chorus of unlearned songs or recalled strings of spoken digits in the presence of speech maskers. A visual cue indicating which loudspeaker (from an array of five) would contain the target improved accuracy for both kinds of stimuli. A cue indicating which time segment (out of a possible five) would contain the target also improved accuracy, but much more for birdsong than for speech. These results suggest that in real world situations, information about where a target of interest is located can enhance its identification, while information about when to listen can also be helpful when targets are unfamiliar or extremely similar to their competitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17453308      PMCID: PMC2538357          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0073-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  25 in total

1.  Evidence for spatial tuning in informational masking using the probe-signal method.

Authors:  T L Arbogast; G Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.

Authors:  J Shen; E M Reingold
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

3.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays.

Authors:  Mari Riess Jones; Heather Moynihan; Noah MacKenzie; Jennifer Puente
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

5.  Psychometric functions for informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Michael R Callahan; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Typologies of attentional networks.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Jason Buhle
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol Ozmeral; Frederick J Gallun; Kamal Sen; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01
View more
  38 in total

1.  Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  How visual cues for when to listen aid selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Lenny A Varghese; Erol J Ozmeral; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-11

3.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

7.  The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-14

10.  The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.