Literature DB >> 22779483

Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Andrew Schwartz1, Josh H McDermott, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

To clarify the role of spatial cues in sound segregation, this study explored whether interaural time differences (ITDs) are sufficient to allow listeners to identify a novel sound source from a mixture of sources. Listeners heard mixtures of two synthetic sounds, a target and distractor, each of which possessed naturalistic spectrotemporal correlations but otherwise lacked strong grouping cues, and which contained either the same or different ITDs. When the task was to judge whether a probe sound matched a source in the preceding mixture, performance improved greatly when the same target was presented repeatedly across distinct distractors, consistent with previous results. In contrast, performance improved only slightly with ITD separation of target and distractor, even when spectrotemporal overlap between target and distractor was reduced. However, when subjects localized, rather than identified, the sources in the mixture, sources with different ITDs were reported as two sources at distinct and accurately identified locations. ITDs alone thus enable listeners to perceptually segregate mixtures of sources, but the perceived content of these sources is inaccurate when other segregation cues, such as harmonicity and common onsets and offsets, do not also promote proper source separation.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22779483      PMCID: PMC3407160          DOI: 10.1121/1.4718637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Dissociation of perceptual judgments of "what" and "where" in an ambiguous auditory scene.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; David Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Binaural release from informational masking in a speech identification task.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands.

Authors:  T N Buell; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference and frequency proximity.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Alex Fox; Emily Orchard-Mills; Johahn Leung; David Alais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  Discrimination and streaming of speech sounds based on differences in interaural and spectral cues.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Ecological origins of perceptual grouping principles in the auditory system.

Authors:  Wiktor Młynarski; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cortical Processing of Binaural Cues as Shown by EEG Responses to Random-Chord Stereograms.

Authors:  Henri Pöntynen; Nelli Salminen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-12-13

7.  Weighting of spatial and spectro-temporal cues for auditory scene analysis by human listeners.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Local inhibition of GABA affects precedence effect in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yanjun Wang; Ningyu Wang; Dan Wang; Jun Jia; Jinfeng Liu; Yan Xie; Xiaohui Wen; Xiaoting Li
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  A Binaural Grouping Model for Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Multitalker Environments.

Authors:  Jing Mi; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Level-weighted averaging in elevation to synchronous amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  Guus C Van Bentum; A John Van Opstal; Chaline M M Van Aartrijk; Marc M Van Wanrooij
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.