Literature DB >> 14714808

Psychometric functions for informational masking.

Robert A Lutfi1, Doris J Kistler, Michael R Callahan, Frederic L Wightman.   

Abstract

The term informational masking has traditionally been used to refer to elevations in signal threshold resulting from masker uncertainty. In the present study, the method of constant stimuli was used to obtain complete psychometric functions (PFs) from 44 normal-hearing listeners in conditions known to produce varying amounts of informational masking. The listener's task was to detect a pure-tone signal in the presence of a broadband noise masker (low masker uncertainty) and in the presence of multitone maskers with frequencies and amplitudes that varied at random from one presentation to the next (high masker uncertainty). Relative to the broadband noise condition, significant reductions were observed in both the slope and the upper asymptote of the PF for multitone maskers producing large amounts of informational masking. Slope was affected more for some listeners and conditions while asymptote was affected more for others; consequently, neither parameter alone was highly predictive of individual thresholds or the amount of informational masking. Mean slopes and asymptotes varied nonmonotonically with the number of masker components in a manner similar to mean thresholds, particularly when the estimated effect of energetic masking on thresholds was subtracted out. As in past studies, the threshold data were well described by a model in which trial-by-trial judgments are based on a weighted sum of levels in dB at the output of independent auditory filters. The psychometric data, however, complicated the model's interpretation in two ways: First, they suggested that, depending on the listener and condition, the weights can either reflect a fixed influence of masker components on each trial or the effect of occasionally mistaking a masker component for the signal from trial to trial. Second, they indicated that in either case the variance of the underlying decision variable as estimated from PF slope is not by itself great enough to account for the observed changes in informational masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14714808      PMCID: PMC2858973          DOI: 10.1121/1.1629303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Strategies used to detect auditory signals in small sets of random maskers.

Authors:  B A Wright; K Saberi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Informational processing of complex sound. III: interference.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of signal and masker uncertainty on children's detection.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

5.  Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; T L Rohtla; P S Deliwala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sex differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; C J Kessler; T M Dethlefs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; P S Deliwala; W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer.

Authors:  D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  18 in total

1.  Spectral processing of two concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Informational masking of speech in children: effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

5.  Across-channel interference in intensity discrimination: the role of practice and listening strategy.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.

Authors:  Uma Balakrishnan; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A detection-theoretic framework for modeling informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas; Lynn Gilbertson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.