Literature DB >> 18567595

The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners.

Stuart Gatehouse1, Michael A Akeroyd.   

Abstract

In a complex listening situation such as a multiperson conversation, the demands on an individual's attention are considerable: There will often be many sounds occurring simultaneously, with continual changes in source and direction. A laboratory analog of this was designed to measure the benefit that helping attention (by visual cueing) would have on word identification. These words were presented unpredictably but were sometimes cued with a temporal cue or a temporal-and-spatial cue. Two groups of hearing-impaired, older-adult listeners participated, 57 unaided and 19 aided. There was a small effect of cueing: The cues gave a 2% benefit in word identification. A variety of subsidiary measures were collected, including the Test of Everyday Attention and the Speech, Spatial, & Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire, but their links with the benefits of cueing were few. The results demonstrate the difficulty of cueing attention to improve word recognition in a complex listening situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567595      PMCID: PMC4111433          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808317395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  18 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.

Authors:  W A Dreschler; H Verschuure; C Ludvigsen; S Westermann
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01

6.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

7.  A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.

Authors:  A MacLeod; Q Summerfield
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-02

8.  The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise.

Authors:  J R Foster; M P Haggard
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-08

9.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap.

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Stuart Gatehouse; Julia Blaschke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  How visual cues for when to listen aid selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Lenny A Varghese; Erol J Ozmeral; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-14

4.  Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Maureen Coughlin
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

5.  Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Carolyn M McClaskey; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 6.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

7.  The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Hilde de Kluiver; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Felicitas Klöckner-Nowotny
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.

Authors:  Tobias Neher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Auditory Phenotypic Variability in Friedreich's Ataxia Patients.

Authors:  Nehzat Koohi; Gilbert Thomas-Black; Paola Giunti; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.