Literature DB >> 20550229

Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity.

Virginia Best1, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Erol J Ozmeral, Norbert Kopco.   

Abstract

Continuity of spatial location was recently shown to improve the ability to identify and recall a sequence of target digits presented in a mixture of confusable maskers [Best et al. (2008). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 13174-13178]. Three follow-up experiments were conducted to explore the basis of this improvement. The results suggest that the benefits of spatial continuity cannot be attributed to (a) the ability to plan where to direct attention in advance; (b) freedom from having to redirect attention across large distances; or (c) the challenge of filtering out signals that are confusable with the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550229      PMCID: PMC2887909          DOI: 10.1121/1.3431093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

3.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-10
  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Bottom-up influences of voice continuity in focusing selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Scott Bressler; Salwa Masud; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-16

3.  The role of syntax in maintaining the integrity of streams of speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of talker discontinuity on cortical dynamics of auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.

Authors:  Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Contributions of Sensory Coding and Attentional Control to Individual Differences in Performance in Spatial Auditory Selective Attention Tasks.

Authors:  Lengshi Dai; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Norbert Kopčo; Elin Roverud; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.