Literature DB >> 21428524

Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.

Virginia Best1, Christine R Mason, Gerald Kidd.   

Abstract

Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss are poorer than listeners with normal hearing at understanding one talker in the presence of another. This deficit is more pronounced when competing talkers are spatially separated, implying a reduced "spatial benefit" in hearing-impaired listeners. This study tested the hypothesis that this deficit is due to increased masking specifically during the simultaneous portions of competing speech signals. Monosyllabic words were compressed to a uniform duration and concatenated to create target and masker sentences with three levels of temporal overlap: 0% (non-overlapping in time), 50% (partially overlapping), or 100% (completely overlapping). Listeners with hearing loss performed particularly poorly in the 100% overlap condition, consistent with the idea that simultaneous speech sounds are most problematic for these listeners. However, spatial release from masking was reduced in all overlap conditions, suggesting that increased masking during periods of temporal overlap is only one factor limiting spatial unmasking in hearing-impaired listeners.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21428524      PMCID: PMC3078033          DOI: 10.1121/1.3533733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-03

7.  Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons.

Authors:  A J Duquesnoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  Binaural interaction and localization with various hearing impairments.

Authors:  H S Colburn
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1982

10.  Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests.

Authors:  R Häusler; S Colburn; E Marr
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1983
View more
  17 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Eric R Thompson; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Aging and the perception of temporally interleaved words.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Christine R Mason; Christine Marino
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.