Literature DB >> 19045685

The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex.

Angela Yarnell Bonino, Lori J Leibold.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection of a 120-ms, 1-kHz tone in the presence of a continuous sequence of 120-ms bursts of either a broadband noise or a random-frequency, two-tone complex. Using the method of constant stimuli, signal-temporal uncertainty was defined as the difference in threshold across temporally uncertain and temporally defined listening conditions. Results indicted an average effect of signal-temporal uncertainty of 2 dB for the noise masker compared to 9 dB for the random-frequency, two-tone masker. These results suggest that signal-temporal uncertainty may be more detrimental for conditions in which informational masking dominates performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045685      PMCID: PMC2677353          DOI: 10.1121/1.2993745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Psychometric functions for informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Michael R Callahan; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals.

Authors:  C S Watson; T L Nichols
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

5.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

6.  Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures.

Authors:  L Marshall; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-03

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; T M Dethlefs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; P S Deliwala; W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection of temporally uncertain signals.

Authors:  D M Green; D L Weber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

1.  How visual cues for when to listen aid selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Lenny A Varghese; Erol J Ozmeral; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Authors:  Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The role of masker fringes for the detection of coherent tone pips.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Daniel E Shub; Eva Maria Carreira
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Assessing the effects of temporal coherence on auditory stream formation through comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Simon Krogholt Christiansen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Yes/no and two-interval forced-choice tasks with listener-based vs observer-based responses.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.

Authors:  Angela Garinis; Lynne Werner; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Switch attention to listen.

Authors:  Imran Dhamani; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile; Mridula Sharma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.