Literature DB >> 22327619

How visual cues for when to listen aid selective auditory attention.

Lenny A Varghese1, Erol J Ozmeral, Virginia Best, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Visual cues are known to aid auditory processing when they provide direct information about signal content, as in lip reading. However, some studies hint that visual cues also aid auditory perception by guiding attention to the target in a mixture of similar sounds. The current study directly tests this idea for complex, nonspeech auditory signals, using a visual cue providing only timing information about the target. Listeners were asked to identify a target zebra finch bird song played at a random time within a longer, competing masker. Two different maskers were used: noise and a chorus of competing bird songs. On half of all trials, a visual cue indicated the timing of the target within the masker. For the noise masker, the visual cue did not affect performance when target and masker were from the same location, but improved performance when target and masker were in different locations. In contrast, for the chorus masker, visual cues improved performance only when target and masker were perceived as coming from the same direction. These results suggest that simple visual cues for when to listen improve target identification by enhancing sounds near the threshold of audibility when the target is energetically masked and by enhancing segregation when it is difficult to direct selective attention to the target. Visual cues help little when target and masker already differ in attributes that enable listeners to engage selective auditory attention effectively, including differences in spectrotemporal structure and in perceived location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22327619      PMCID: PMC3346891          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0314-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  19 in total

1.  Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation.

Authors:  R Drullman; A W Bronkhorst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.

Authors:  K W Grant; P F Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol Ozmeral; Frederick J Gallun; Kamal Sen; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

6.  The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

9.  Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: does signal content matter?

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Mitchell S Sommers; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30
View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Active inference, selective attention, and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; Thomas Parr; Timothy D Griffiths; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Carolyn M McClaskey; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Can visual capture of sound separate auditory streams?

Authors:  Chiara Valzolgher; Elena Giovanelli; Roberta Sorio; Giuseppe Rabini; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Caitlin Corkhill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sound-by-sound thalamic stimulation modulates midbrain auditory excitability and relative binaural sensitivity in frogs.

Authors:  Abhilash Ponnath; Hamilton E Farris
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Rapid encoding of an internal model for imitative learning.

Authors:  Mugdha Deshpande; Fakhriddin Pirlepesov; Thierry Lints
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.