Literature DB >> 17377765

[Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty].

J Gulow1, R Scholz, G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio.   

Abstract

Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty are anchored exclusively in the metaphysis and the proximal part of the diaphysis. Therefore, they are much shorter than the classic standard stems. These implants are specially favourable in terms of eventual revision surgery, and also due to the fact that with close diaphyseal bone marrow spaces a sufficient proximal size dimensioning is possible. In this study, the best known short-stemmed systems in clinical use are introduced. Positive long-term results are so far available only with the Pipino and Mayo stems, short and partially medium-term experience with the remaining short stems (C.F.P.(R), Metha, PROXIMA, ESKA) are--with the available learning curve--encouraging. Despite the call for sufficient experience and scientific evaluation, short-stemmed endoprostheses already represent a valuable alternative in endoprosthetics for younger patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17377765     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1071-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  10 in total

1.  [Early functional results with the Mayo-hip, a short stem system with metaphyseal-intertrochanteric fixation].

Authors:  R Hube; M Zaage; W Hein; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  F M Westphal; N Bishop; M Honl; E Hille; K Püschel; M M Morlock
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Migration pattern of a short femoral neck preserving stem.

Authors:  S M Röhrl; M G Li; E Pedersen; G Ullmark; B Nivbrant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biodynamic total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  F Pipino; P M Calderale
Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1987-09

6.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.

Authors:  B F Morrey; R A Adams; M Kessler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

7.  Ultra-short stems with proximal load transfer: Clinical and radiographic results at five-year follow-up.

Authors:  F S Santori; M Manili; N Fredella; M Tonci Ottieri; N Santori
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Biomechanics of a new short-stemmed uncemented hip prosthesis: An in-vitro study in human bone.

Authors:  F M Westphal; N Bishop; K Puschel; M M Morlock
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report.

Authors:  C V Albanese; M Rendine; F De Palma; A Impagliazzo; F Falez; F Postacchini; C Villani; R Passariello; F S Santori
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Bone preservation with a conservative metaphyseal loading implant.

Authors:  N Santori; C V Albanese; I D Learmonth; F S Santori
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.756

  10 in total
  22 in total

1.  [Is shorter really better? : Philosophy of short stem prosthesis designs].

Authors:  J Jerosch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Differences between short stem prostheses].

Authors:  J Jerosch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Jens Gronewold; Sebastian Berner; Gavin Olender; Christof Hurschler; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Femoral bone remodeling after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a prospective densitometric study.

Authors:  Josef Hochreiter; Georg Mattiassich; Reinhold Ortmaier; Martin Steinmair; Conrad Anderl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [On the biomechanics of the hip: relevance of femoral anteversion for hip contact force and loading using a short-stemmed prostheses].

Authors:  S W Tohtz; M O Heller; W R Taylor; C Perka; G N Duda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  [Uncemented arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  C von Schulze Pellengahr; A Fottner; S Utzschneider; M Schmitt-Sody; W Teske; T Lichtinger; S A Esenwein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Short neck-preserving femoral stem for total hip arthroplasty: medium-term results of a 68-case series.

Authors:  Marta Del Río-Arteaga; Jesús Payo-Ollero; Mercedes Vallejo; David Serrano-Toledano; Boris García-Benítez; Juan Ribera
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.928

9.  The short stem GHEs in total hip replacement - experience after 380 implantations.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghanem; M Farag; P Schneider; P Hitzler; J Gulow; G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2013-11-19

10.  Bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis--a prospective 5 year follow-up.

Authors:  Wolfram Steens; Friedrich Boettner; Rainer Bader; Ralf Skripitz; Alberto Schneeberger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.