Literature DB >> 3452603

Biodynamic total hip prosthesis.

F Pipino1, P M Calderale.   

Abstract

The biodynamic total hip prosthesis which was devised in 1977-78 and implanted in 1979 was derived from a series of experimental studies and a lengthy clinical experience, both dating back to 1968. This prosthesis introduced two new and original concepts into the field of prosthetic hip surgery: 1) the biequatorial design of the cup; 2) the preservation of the femoral neck. This prosthetic system is based on maximum preservation of the bone stock as well as hip function. The biequatorial cup allows for positioning corresponding to that of the normal acetabulum. The femoral component incorporates features (collar, sagittal and frontal angulation, external surface, etc.) which facilitate proximal cortical fixation and cancellous metaphyseal biological anchoring, thus ensuring total adhesion. The average 3.5 years follow-up (maximum 7 years, minimum one year) in 280 cases confirms the effectiveness of this prosthesis and the validity of the basic principles on which it is founded.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3452603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0390-5489


  11 in total

1.  [Conception and first results of the Spiron cementless femoral neck screw prosthesis].

Authors:  B Birkenhauer; H Kistmacher; J Ries
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Gulow; R Scholz; G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Neck-preserving femoral stems.

Authors:  Karthig Rajakulendran; Richard E Field
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-07

4.  [Periprosthetic femoral bone reaction after total hip arthroplasty with preservation of the collum femoris : CT-assisted osteodensitometry 1 and 3 years postoperatively].

Authors:  R Schmidt; S Gollwitzer; T E Nowak; M Nowak; L Häberle; A Kress; R Forst; L A Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Medium-term comparison of results in obese patients and non-obese hip prostheses with Metha® short stem.

Authors:  Yves Chammaï; Michel Brax
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-12-24

6.  Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems.

Authors:  F Falez; F Casella; G Panegrossi; F Favetti; C Barresi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-03-13

7.  A prospective cohort study on the short collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem using RSA and DXA. Primary stability but no prevention of proximal bone loss in 27 patients followed for 2 years.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Per Mattsson; Jan Milbrink; Hans Mallmin; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Thomas Graf; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Andrea Bauer-Melnyk; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  The short stem GHEs in total hip replacement - experience after 380 implantations.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghanem; M Farag; P Schneider; P Hitzler; J Gulow; G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2013-11-19

10.  Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Loes W A H van Beers; Jakob van Oldenrijk; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Carel H Geerdink; Bob B A M Niers; Wouter Runne; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.