Literature DB >> 23271689

The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.

Thilo Floerkemeier1, Jens Gronewold, Sebastian Berner, Gavin Olender, Christof Hurschler, Henning Windhagen, Gabriela von Lewinski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The number of candidates for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is steadily increasing, while the average patient age is decreasing for primary THA. The rise in THA is mainly due to excellent clinical outcomes and the extended longevity of modern implants. Short stem arthroplasties with predominantly metaphyseal fixation such as the Metha® stem are suggested for young patients. It is hypothesised that the more physiological load transfer of these devices reduces stress shielding, which in turn may reduce the risk of aseptic loosening. However, patients with femoral deformities often require a deviation of the resection height. To this end, our aim was to evaluate how resection height influences strain patterns in order to characterise possible limits for short stem implantation.
METHODS: Biomechanical testing using ten strain gauges on synthetic bone illustrated the strain patterns of three different resection heights (0, +5 and +10 mm) for the Metha stem.
RESULTS: The greatest differences in strains were displayed at the "high" (most proximal) resection height (+10 mm) when compared to the non-implanted strain pattern. At the medial calcar, the strain was 143% for +10 mm, 96% for +5 mm and 94% for 0 mm. Overall, discrepancies were less for deeper resections.
CONCLUSIONS: The deeper the resection, the more similar the strain patterns are when compared to a non-implanted synthetic bone. Changes in strain patterns are induced by variation in the varus/valgus positioning of the implant and by different offsets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23271689      PMCID: PMC3580111          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1725-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Annelene von der Haar-Tran; Henning Windhagen; Bernd A Behrens; Patrick Wefstaedt; Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Gulow; R Scholz; G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Midterm results of "thrust plate" prosthesis.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Stephanie Wessel; Georg Deuretzbacher; Michael Protzen; Wolfgang Ruther
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Bone integration of new stemless hip implants (proxima vs. nanos). A DXA study: preliminary results.

Authors:  G Logroscino; V Ciriello; E D'Antonio; V De Tullio; P Piciocco; G Magliocchetti Lombi; F S Santori; C V Albanese
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.219

Review 5.  Survival of short hip stems with a "modern", trochanter-sparing design - a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Elke Rometsch; Pieter K Bos; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  The NANOS short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a mid term follow-up.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Peter Ettinger; Matthias Lerch; Kerstin Radtke; Stefan Budde; Marco Ezechieli; Christoph Becher; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Cementless short stem hip arthroplasty METHA® as an encouraging option in adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Nora Tscheuschner; Tilman Calliess; Marco Ezechieli; Stephanie Floerkemeier; Stefan Budde; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Sports activity after short-stem hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Stefan Grote; Matthias Pietschmann; Patrick Weber; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years.

Authors:  Carlina V Albanese; Francesco S Santori; Laura Pavan; Ian D Learmonth; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems.

Authors:  P O Østbyhaug; J Klaksvik; P Romundstad; A Aamodt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Matthias Woiczinski; Tobias F Schmidutz; Patrick Weber; Alexander C Paulus; Arnd Steinbrück; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

4.  Insufficient lateral stem contact is an influencing factor for significant subsidence in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yingyong Suksathien; Pattawat Chuvanichanon; Thanut Tippimanchai; Jithayut Sueajui
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-18

5.  Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviour of Two Cementless Short Stems for Hip Replacement: Linea Anatomic and Minihip.

Authors:  Sergio Gabarre; Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Luis Gracia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.

Authors:  Rene Burchard; Sabrina Braas; Christian Soost; Jan Adriaan Graw; Jan Schmitt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Outcome of extensive varus and valgus stem alignment in short-stem THA: clinical and radiological analysis using EBRA-FCA.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Tobias Freitag; Stefanie Donner; Mark Predrag Kovacevic; Ralf Bieger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Three-year migration analysis of a new metaphyseal anchoring short femoral stem in THA using EBRA-FCA.

Authors:  Patrick Reinbacher; Maria Anna Smolle; Joerg Friesenbichler; Alexander Draschl; Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Centralizing the Cemented Exeter Femoral Stem Using the Direct Lateral Approach: Surgical Tips and Radiological Evaluation.

Authors:  Sriram Srinivasan; Rohi Shah; Faizal Rayan; David Ensor; Sharan Sambhwani; Dipen K Menon
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.