Literature DB >> 15549249

[Early functional results with the Mayo-hip, a short stem system with metaphyseal-intertrochanteric fixation].

R Hube1, M Zaage, W Hein, H Reichel.   

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty has become one of the most successful standard procedures in orthopedic surgery. With a more frequent use in young and active patients bone saving procedures become more important. The goal is to save good bone stock for the revision procedure. One example of conservative femoral implants is the Mayo-stem with reported long term results. The stem design allows a metaphyseal intertrochanteric multipoint fixation for primary fixation. The surgical technique is simple. Using a transgluteal approach, the medial preparation of the femoral neck decreases significantly the irritation of the abductor tendons. In a prospective-randomized study, the early functional results with the Mayo-stem were significantly better than the results achieved with a cement-free standard stem. The Mayo-stem may not be indicated for every hip situation. Its use, however, in cases with normal anatomy contributes to save autologeous bone. Therefore, this short stem is a sensible alternative to standard stems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549249     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-004-0711-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  23 in total

1.  Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; F Dorey; P Shekelle; L Schumacher; D J Kilgus; B J Thomas; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

3.  Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J H Kuiper; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Long-term results with the uncemented thrust plate prosthesis (TPP).

Authors:  A H Huggler; H A Jacob; H Bereiter; M Haferkorn; C Ryf; R Schenk
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.

Authors:  S D Cook; J J Klawitter; A M Weinstein
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1980-03

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis.

Authors:  D McMinn; R Treacy; K Lin; P Pynsent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.

Authors:  B F Morrey; R A Adams; M Kessler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

9.  Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ten- to 18-year results.

Authors:  N R Boeree; G C Bannister
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral head resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis in the young patient.

Authors:  Anthony Adili; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  21 in total

1.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Cementless stems of the hip. Current status].

Authors:  H Effenberger; M Imhof; U Witzel; S Rehart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [The femoral neck prosthesis CUT. Three- to six-year results].

Authors:  S A Ender; A Machner; G Pap; H Grasshoff; H W Neumann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Gulow; R Scholz; G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study].

Authors:  D Wohlrab; J-W Droege; T Mendel; K Brehme; K Riedl; S Leuchte; W Hein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Bone-preserving total hip arthroplasty in avascular necrosis of the hip-a matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  David Merschin; Richard Häne; Mersedeh Tohidnezhad; Thomas Pufe; Wolf Drescher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Early clinical results of a new conservative hip stem.

Authors:  Jaime J Morales de Cano; Christian Gordo; Jose M Illobre
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-27

8.  [On the biomechanics of the hip: relevance of femoral anteversion for hip contact force and loading using a short-stemmed prostheses].

Authors:  S W Tohtz; M O Heller; W R Taylor; C Perka; G N Duda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  [Uncemented arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  C von Schulze Pellengahr; A Fottner; S Utzschneider; M Schmitt-Sody; W Teske; T Lichtinger; S A Esenwein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  [Total hip arthroplasty with the cementless spiron femoral neck prosthesis].

Authors:  A Lugeder; E Häring; A Müller; P Droste; P Dorste; J Zeichen
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.