Literature DB >> 25116246

[Differences between short stem prostheses].

J Jerosch1.   

Abstract

The short stem designs currently available are significantly different and can be differentiated into neck containing, partial containing and neck resection designs. In this article, the differences in the design features are presented. These include the differences in the technique of implantation, the significant differences in the reproducibility of the given anatomy of the patient and also concerning their osteologic competence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25116246     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-2308-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  26 in total

1.  Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Michael Schneider; Nicole Bogner; Nadine Botha; Matthias Gebauer; Thorsten Gehrke; Bernd Schwantes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Gulow; R Scholz; G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ho Chen; Bernard F Morrey; Kai-Nan An; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Khaled J Saleh; Markus O Heller; Benoit Mollard; Christian König; Sergej Kammerzell
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  The NANOS short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a mid term follow-up.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Peter Ettinger; Matthias Lerch; Kerstin Radtke; Stefan Budde; Marco Ezechieli; Christoph Becher; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Arthroprosthesis of the hip at 12 to 16 year follow-up. A clinical and radiographic study of 17 cases.

Authors:  F Pipino; L Molfetta
Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1987-03

7.  [Two-year results of a modular short hip stem prosthesis--a prospective study].

Authors:  A Braun; A Sabah
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 0.923

8.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.

Authors:  B F Morrey; R A Adams; M Kessler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

9.  Distal cortical hypertrophy following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter; R W Fechtman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement--failure mode analysis and influence of implant material.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; Thomas Weik; Wilhelm Bloemer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bone-preserving total hip arthroplasty in avascular necrosis of the hip-a matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  David Merschin; Richard Häne; Mersedeh Tohidnezhad; Thomas Pufe; Wolf Drescher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes with the Nanos™ short-stem hip implant at 24 months: A prospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Michael Schwarze; Thilo Floerkemeier; Jochen Plagge; Nils Wirries; Henning Windhagen; Fritz Thorey; Alexander Derksen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-06

3.  Short versus conventional stem in cementless total hip arthroplasty : An evidence-based approach with registry data of mid-term survival.

Authors:  Arnd Steinbrück; Alexander W Grimberg; Johanna Elliott; Oliver Melsheimer; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Ahmet Ercan; Sherif M Sokkar; Gebhard Schmid; Timm J Filler; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Joerg Jerosch
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-11-18

5.  Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.

Authors:  Rene Burchard; Sabrina Braas; Christian Soost; Jan Adriaan Graw; Jan Schmitt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with the NANOS neck preserving hip stem: a 10 to 16-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Santis; Nadia Bonfiglio; Mattia Basilico; Greta Tanzi Germani; Maria Rosaria Matrangolo; Angelo Carosini; Giuseppe Malerba; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.