Literature DB >> 8609294

Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio.

M D Good1, R H Gilkey.   

Abstract

The sound localization ability of human observers has been frequently examined in quiet environments, but there have been relatively few studies that have considered the effect of noise on sound localization. In this study, three subjects judged the perceived direction of broadband click-train signal in the quiet and in the presence of a broadband noise at nine signal-to-noise ratios, which varied over a 23 dB range. The signal could originate from any of 239 spatial locations that completely surrounded the subjects in azimuth 360 degrees) and ranged from -45 degrees to (+)90 degrees in elevation; the masker (when present) was always located directly in front of the subjects at 0 degrees azimuth and 0 degree elevation. The subjects indicated the perceived direction of the signal by pointing at a 20-cm-diam spherical model of auditory space. As the signal-to-noise ratio was lowered, the accuracy of localization judgments decreased nearly monotonically. However, the accuracy of judgments relative to the median plane (i.e., the left/right dimension) was less strongly influenced by the presence of noise than was the accuracy of judgments relative to the horizontal plane (i.e., the up/down dimension). The accuracy of judgments relative to the frontal plane (i.e., the front/back dimension) was most strongly influenced by noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609294     DOI: 10.1121/1.415233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  GABA is involved in spatial unmasking in the frog auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Lin; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relearning sound localization with a new ear.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

5.  Simulation study of power and sample size for repeated measures with multinomial outcomes: an application to sound direction identification experiments (SDIE).

Authors:  Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Speech localization in a multitalker mixture.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Virginia Best; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of forward masking on sound localization in cats: basic findings with broadband maskers.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Ade Deane-Pratt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

10.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.