Literature DB >> 19927684

Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Virginia D Driscoll1, Jacob Oleson, Dingfeng Jiang, Kate Gfeller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The simulation of the CI (cochlear implant) signal presents a degraded representation of each musical instrument, which makes recognition difficult.
PURPOSE: To examine the efficiency and effectiveness of three types of training on recognition of musical instruments as presented through simulations of the sounds transmitted through a CI. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: repeated exposure, feedback, and direct instruction. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-six adults with normal hearing. INTERVENTION: Each participant completed three training sessions per week, over a five-week time period, in which they listened to the CI simulations of eight different musical instruments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Analyses on percent of instruments identified correctly showed statistically significant differences between recognition accuracy of the three training conditions (p < .01).
RESULTS: those assigned to the direct instruction group showed the greatest improvement over the five-week training period as well as sustained improvement after training. The feedback group achieved the next highest level of recognition accuracy. The repeated exposure group showed modest improvement during the first three-week time period, but no subsequent improvements.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that different types of training are differentially effective with regard to improving recognition of musical instruments presented through a degraded signal, which has practical implications for the auditory rehabilitation of persons who use cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19927684      PMCID: PMC2784659          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.20.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  45 in total

1.  Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.

Authors:  S Fujita; J Ito
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Chin-Tuan Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.

Authors:  Charles J Limb
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

Review 6.  Some effects of aging on central auditory processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; James F Jerger
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

7.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

8.  Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  S Pijl
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children.

Authors:  Carol Olszewski; Kate Gfeller; Rebecca Froman; Julie Stordahl; Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2005-09

Review 10.  Central auditory system plasticity and aural rehabilitation of adults.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug
View more
  18 in total

1.  The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski; John F Knutson; Christopher Turner; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2012

2.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

3.  Music perception ability of korean adult cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Eunoak Kim; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Hyung-Jong Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  [Music therapy in adults with cochlear implants : Effects on music perception and subjective sound quality].

Authors:  E Hutter; M Grapp; H Argstatter
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

6.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

7.  The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11

8.  A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Emily Guthe; Virginia Driscoll; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2015-09

9.  Music Perception of Cochlear Implant Recipients with Implications for Music Instruction: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Feilin Hsiao; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  Update Univ S C Dep Music       Date:  2012-02-16

10.  Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.

Authors:  Alexis T Roy; Patpong Jiradejvong; Courtney Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.