Literature DB >> 27488643

Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.

Jayaganesh Swaminathan1, Christine R Mason2, Timothy M Streeter2, Virginia Best2, Elin Roverud2, Gerald Kidd2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: While conversing in a crowded social setting, a listener is often required to follow a target speech signal amid multiple competing speech signals (the so-called "cocktail party" problem). In such situations, separation of the target speech signal in azimuth from the interfering masker signals can lead to an improvement in target intelligibility, an effect known as spatial release from masking (SRM). This study assessed the contributions of two stimulus properties that vary with separation of sound sources, binaural envelope (ENV) and temporal fine structure (TFS), to SRM in normal-hearing (NH) human listeners. Target speech was presented from the front and speech maskers were either colocated with or symmetrically separated from the target in azimuth. The target and maskers were presented either as natural speech or as "noise-vocoded" speech in which the intelligibility was conveyed only by the speech ENVs from several frequency bands; the speech TFS within each band was replaced with noise carriers. The experiments were designed to preserve the spatial cues in the speech ENVs while retaining/eliminating them from the TFS. This was achieved by using the same/different noise carriers in the two ears. A phenomenological auditory-nerve model was used to verify that the interaural correlations in TFS differed across conditions, whereas the ENVs retained a high degree of correlation, as intended. Overall, the results from this study revealed that binaural TFS cues, especially for frequency regions below 1500 Hz, are critical for achieving SRM in NH listeners. Potential implications for studying SRM in hearing-impaired listeners are discussed. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Acoustic signals received by the auditory system pass first through an array of physiologically based band-pass filters. Conceptually, at the output of each filter, there are two principal forms of temporal information: slowly varying fluctuations in the envelope (ENV) and rapidly varying fluctuations in the temporal fine structure (TFS). The importance of these two types of information in everyday listening (e.g., conversing in a noisy social situation; the "cocktail-party" problem) has not been established. This study assessed the contributions of binaural ENV and TFS cues for understanding speech in multiple-talker situations. Results suggest that, whereas the ENV cues are important for speech intelligibility, binaural TFS cues are critical for perceptually segregating the different talkers and thus for solving the cocktail party problem.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/368250-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory-nerve; cocktail-party problem; envelope; spatial release from masking; speech; temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27488643      PMCID: PMC4971368          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4421-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

3.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Response to noise of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  10 in total

1.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Temporal Coding of Single Auditory Nerve Fibers Is Not Degraded in Aging Gerbils.

Authors:  Amarins N Heeringa; Lichun Zhang; Go Ashida; Rainer Beutelmann; Friederike Steenken; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence of Reduced Binaural Temporal Processing in the Aging and Hearing Impaired Human Auditory System.

Authors:  Charlotte Vercammen; Tine Goossens; Jaime Undurraga; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 10.  The hunt for hidden hearing loss in humans: From preclinical studies to effective interventions.

Authors:  Joaquin T Valderrama; Angel de la Torre; David McAlpine
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.152

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.