Literature DB >> 21271274

Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.

Jong Ho Won1, Christopher G Clinard, Seeyoun Kwon, Vasant K Dasika, Kaibao Nie, Ward R Drennan, Kelly L Tremblay, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found a significant correlation between spectral-ripple discrimination and speech and music perception in cochlear implant (CI) users. This relationship could be of use to clinicians and scientists who are interested in using spectral-ripple stimuli in the assessment and habilitation of CI users. However, previous psychoacoustic tasks used to assess spectral discrimination are not suitable for all populations, and it would be beneficial to develop methods that could be used to test all age ranges, including pediatric implant users. Additionally, it is important to understand how ripple stimuli are processed in the central auditory system and how their neural representation contributes to behavioral performance. For this reason, we developed a single-interval, yes/no paradigm that could potentially be used both behaviorally and electrophysiologically to estimate spectral-ripple threshold. In experiment 1, behavioral thresholds obtained using the single-interval method were compared to thresholds obtained using a previously established three-alternative forced-choice method. A significant correlation was found (r = 0.84, p = 0.0002) in 14 adult CI users. The spectral-ripple threshold obtained using the new method also correlated with speech perception in quiet and noise. In experiment 2, the effect of the number of vocoder-processing channels on the behavioral and physiological threshold in normal-hearing listeners was determined. Behavioral thresholds, using the new single-interval method, as well as cortical P1-N1-P2 responses changed as a function of the number of channels. Better behavioral and physiological performance (i.e., better discrimination ability at higher ripple densities) was observed as more channels added. In experiment 3, the relationship between behavioral and physiological data was examined. Amplitudes of the P1-N1-P2 "change" responses were significantly correlated with d' values from the single-interval behavioral procedure. Results suggest that the single-interval procedure with spectral-ripple phase inversion in ongoing stimuli is a valid approach for measuring behavioral or physiological spectral resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21271274      PMCID: PMC3085690          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0257-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  46 in total

1.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner; Amy Behrens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

3.  Frequency-specific threshold determination with the CERAgram method: basic principle and retrospective evaluation of data.

Authors:  B Ross; B Lütkenhöner; C Pantev; M Hoke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

5.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood estimators in nonintensive auditory psychophysics.

Authors:  K Saberi; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-08

6.  The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Frequency resolving power measured by rippled noise.

Authors:  V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness.

Authors:  C W Ponton; M Don; J J Eggermont; M D Waring; B Kwong; A Masuda
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer.

Authors:  D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  32 in total

1.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Ward R Drennan; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

Review 6.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

8.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Li-Kuei Chiou; Benjamin Kirby; Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Aniket Saoji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.