Literature DB >> 17318449

Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

C Phelps1, F Wood, P Bennett, K Brain, J Gray.   

Abstract

Individuals undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment have been found to have a poor understanding of the process, which may affect how well they cope with learning their risk. This paper reports free-text data from questionnaires completed by women undergoing a randomised controlled trial of a psychological intervention. Of the 268 women undergoing genetic assessment for familial breast/ovarian cancer risk who were invited to take part in the trial, 157 women returned research questionnaires. Of these, 97 women provided free-text comments upon referral to a cancer genetics clinic, 62 provided comments whilst waiting for risk information (average, moderate or high), and 36 women provided comments following notification of risk. This paper reports a thematic analysis of the free-text data. Themes reflected individuals' poor knowledge and uncertainty about genetic risk assessment. How well individuals responded to learning their risk depended upon whether expectations had been met. Regardless of risk, individuals undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment are likely to benefit from increased information about its process and timescales, and access to increased psychological support. Free-text comments can provide valuable data about individuals' expectations and knowledge of genetics services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17318449     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9086-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  39 in total

1.  Welsh women's comments about breast problems and the care given: a qualitative study in the community.

Authors:  R Pill; F C Wood; E Renold; M Robling; A Edwards; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  A randomized controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Ceri Phelps; Kate Brain; Kerenza Hood; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Monica Tucker; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?

Authors:  M Watson; V Duvivier; M Wade Walsh; S Ashley; J Davidson; M Papaikonomou; V Murday; N Sacks; R Eeles
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Falling through the cracks. Women's experiences of ineligibility for genetic testing for risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Bottorff; L G Balneaves; J Buxton; P A Ratner; M McCullum; K Chalmers; T Hack
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The information and support needs of women at high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer: how can cancer genetic services give patients what they want?

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Kate Brain; Jonathon Gray; Elizabeth France
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact.

Authors:  A Fry; A Cull; S Appleton; R Rush; S Holloway; D Gorman; R Cetnarskyj; R Thomas; J Campbell; E Anderson; M Steel; M Porteous; H Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?

Authors:  Wendy L Lipworth; Heather M Davey; Stacy M Carter; Claire Hooker; Wendy Hu
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara France; Gethin Griffith; Gethin Griffin; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.

Authors:  Carin R Espenschied; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Sharon Sand; Karen Hurley; Kimberly C Banks; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Health behaviors and psychological distress in women initiating BRCA1/2 genetic testing: comparison with control population.

Authors:  Michel Dorval; Karine Bouchard; Elizabeth Maunsell; Marie Plante; Jocelyne Chiquette; Stéphanie Camden; Michel J Dugas; Jacques Simard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Young Women's Perceptions Regarding Communication with Healthcare Providers About Breast Cancer, Risk, and Prevention.

Authors:  Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Karena F Sapsis; Betsy Smither; Jennifer Reynolds; Ben Wilburn; Temeika Fairley
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Descriptive and numeric estimation of risk for psychotic disorders among affected individuals and relatives: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin; Catriona Hippman; William G Honer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Patient perspectives on delays in diagnosis and treatment of cancer: a qualitative analysis of free-text data.

Authors:  Rachel K Parsonage; Julia Hiscock; Rebecca-Jane Law; Richard D Neal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  "I have always believed I was at high risk..." The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  J Hilgart; C Phelps; P Bennett; K Hood; K Brain; A Murray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.