Literature DB >> 26142384

The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Belinda Thewes1, Bettina Meiser, Monica Tucker, Kathy Tucker.   

Abstract

This study aims to survey the unmet support needs of women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. In total, 173 unaffected women with a family history of breast cancer completed a 28-item purposely-designed mailed survey. The majority of participants did not report a high level of unmet need for support. Receiving further information about cancer genetics was the most commonly reported area of unmet need. Only about 20% of participants reported a moderate to high degree of interest in attending a hypothetical support group. However, a higher degree of interest was expressed in internet-based information and supportive interventions. Amongst those interested in attending a support group, discussion, and receiving further information were the most preferred activities. Higher levels of unmet support needs were significantly associated with interest in attending groups. No demographic variables were found to predict interest in attending a support group. Implications for those considering establishing support groups are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 26142384     DOI: 10.1023/A:1021447201809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  15 in total

1.  Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; V Schnieden; M Gattas; J Kirk; G Suthers; E Haan; K Tucker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  B Bonevski; R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; L Burton; P Cook; A Boyes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Clinical and biological aspects of bereavement and loss-induced depression: a reappraisal.

Authors:  M Biondi; A Picardi
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 17.659

5.  Reproductive pasts, reproductive futures. Genetic counseling and its effectiveness.

Authors:  J R Sorenson; J P Swazey; N A Scotch; C M Kavanagh; D B Matthews
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1981

6.  Information recall in genetic counselling: a pilot study of its assessment.

Authors:  S Michie; D French; A Allanson; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

7.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Depression and anxiety symptoms in women at high risk for breast cancer: pilot study of a group intervention.

Authors:  D K Wellisch; A Hoffman; S Goldman; J Hammerstein; K Klein; M Bell
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.

Authors:  Carin R Espenschied; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Sharon Sand; Karen Hurley; Kimberly C Banks; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Educational and Psychosocial Support Needs in Lynch Syndrome: Implementation and Assessment of an Educational Workshop and Support Group.

Authors:  Marina J Corines; Jada G Hamilton; Emily Glogowski; Chris A Anrig; Rachael Goldberg; Kate Niehaus; Erin Salo-Mullen; Megan Harlan; Margaret R Sheehan; Magan Trottier; Asad Ahsraf; Christina Tran; Lauren Jacobs; Rohini Rau-Murthy; Anne G Lincoln; Mark E Robson; Jose G Guillem; Arnold J Markowitz; Kenneth Offit; Zsofia K Stadler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Psychosocial Needs and Facilitators of Mothers Caring for Children with Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Holly L Peay; Bettina Meiser; Kathleen Kinnett; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Implementing a telephone based peer support intervention for women with a BRCA1/2 mutation.

Authors:  Ashley Farrelly; Victoria White; Mary-Anne Young; Michael Jefford; Sandra Ieropoli; Jessica Duffy; Ingrid Winship; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Psychosocial factors associated with quality of life among individuals attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Anniken Hamang Carlsson; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Gunilla Berglund; Gerd Karin Natvig
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lisa Hughes; Ceri Phelps
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Unmet support needs and distress among women with a BRCA1/2 mutation.

Authors:  Ashley Farrelly; Victoria White; Bettina Meiser; Michael Jefford; Mary-Anne Young; Sandra Ieropoli; Ingrid Winship; Jessica Duffy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Claudia Stracke; Clarissa Lemmen; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler; Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.