Literature DB >> 18481164

Health behaviors and psychological distress in women initiating BRCA1/2 genetic testing: comparison with control population.

Michel Dorval1, Karine Bouchard, Elizabeth Maunsell, Marie Plante, Jocelyne Chiquette, Stéphanie Camden, Michel J Dugas, Jacques Simard.   

Abstract

The study objective was to compare breast cancer screening practices, lifestyle behaviors and psychological distress among 640 women initiating BRCA1/2 testing to those among 9,498 similarly-aged women from the general population. Health behaviors and psychological distress were reported in a self-administered questionnaire at pre-test genetic counseling. Regression analyses indicate that high-risk women were more frequently performing breast cancer screening and, in the case of those previously diagnosed with cancer, were more likely to be non-smokers and physically active than women from general population. However, women initiating BRCA1/2 testing were significantly more distressed than controls. Globally, high-risk women seemed to be well informed about recommendations for women who are at high risk and to have access to screening adapted to their risk level. Given their significant psychological distress, providing minimal psychosocial support to all women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing at pre-test genetic counseling is relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18481164     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9150-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  57 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K Armstrong; A Eisen; B Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population.

Authors:  Lee S Caplan; David V McQueen; Judith R Qualters; Marilyn Leff; Carol Garrett; Ned Calonge
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Marital stability after breast cancer.

Authors:  M Dorval; E Maunsell; J Taylor-Brown; M Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-01-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Genetic counseling.

Authors:  F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Social support and survival among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  E Maunsell; J Brisson; L Deschênes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  The role of distress in uptake and response to predisposition genetic testing: the BMPR2 experience.

Authors:  Diana L Jones; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-15

2.  French women's breast self-examination practices with time after undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing.

Authors:  C Maheu; T Apostolidis; A Petri-Cal; E Mouret-Fourme; M Gauthier-Villars; C Lasset; P Berthet; J-P Fricker; O Caron; E Luporsi; L Gladieff; C Noguès; C Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Karen Hurley; Mary B Daly; Andrew Godwin; Joanne S Buzaglo; Kuang-Yi Wen
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-14

4.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Life events may contribute to family communication about cancer risk following BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Claudia Côté; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Self-reported mammography use following BRCA1/2 genetic testing may be overestimated.

Authors:  Geneviève Larouche; Karine Bouchard; Jocelyne Chiquette; Christine Desbiens; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Lifestyle Risk Factors Among People Who Have Had Cancer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  John M Quillin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  The influence of acculturation and breast cancer-specific distress on perceived barriers to genetic testing for breast cancer among women of African descent.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Tiffany A Edwards; Andrea Forman; Karen Brown; Nidhi Kapil-Pair; Dana H Bovbjerg; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A Retrospective Exploration of the Impact of the 'Angelina Jolie Effect' on the Single State-Wide Familial Cancer Program in Perth, Western Australia.

Authors:  Rebecca Freedman; Helen Mountain; Dian Karina; Lyn Schofield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Genetics: breast cancer as an exemplar.

Authors:  Rebekah Hamilton
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.