| Literature DB >> 20119651 |
J Hilgart1, C Phelps, P Bennett, K Hood, K Brain, A Murray.
Abstract
It is well-recognised that receipt of cancer genetic risk information can evoke a mix of both positive and negative emotional responses. Objective risk itself is not necessarily predictive of emotional response to receipt of risk information and the Cue Adaptive Reasoning Account (CARA; Renner, 2004) suggests that that the degree to which level of risk is consistent with expectations may influence emotional responses. This paper reports a thematic analysis of the free-text data structured around responses to the three risk labels: average, moderate or high. Data is reported from both 123 women and 15 men, including those with a past or current cancer diagnosis. Reactions to risk information appear to be dependent upon participants' pre-conceived expectations about their level of cancer risk. Many average risk respondents questioned the accuracy of their result, whereas high risk information was often expected. Findings are discussed in relation to the CARA model and clinical implications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20119651 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9324-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fam Cancer ISSN: 1389-9600 Impact factor: 2.375