Literature DB >> 19011994

Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Paul Bennett1, Clare Wilkinson, Jim Turner, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Barbara France, Gethin Griffith, Gethin Griffin, Jonathon Gray.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-eight women undergoing assessment for genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer completed questionnaires at entry into the assessment process and following risk provision. The key variable of interest was the level of intrusive worries at each time, and factors associated with the level of intrusive worries following risk provision. Based on the CARA model (Renner, Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30:384-396, 2004), it was expected that an unexpected risk assessment (whether good or bad) would result in high levels of intrusive thoughts. Other potential moderators of worry included neuroticism, level of threat experienced (low control, high perceived risk), the use of differing coping efforts, and the available social support. Of note was that while levels of intrusive thoughts fell in all risk groups following risk provision, unexpectedly only women found to be at population risk reported an increase of active attempts to distract from intrusive worries at this time. The CARA model was not supported. However, intrusion scores were independently associated with higher levels of neuroticism, a lack of confidant support, and a confrontive coping response. Active avoidance scores were uniquely associated with being assigned as population risk, neuroticism, lack of confidant and affective support, and the use of avoidant coping. Together, these variables accounted for 33% of the variance in intrusion scores and 31% of the variance in avoidance scores. The implications of these findings is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19011994     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9221-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  29 in total

1.  Biased reasoning: adaptive responses to health risk feedback.

Authors:  Britta Renner
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-03

2.  A randomized controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Ceri Phelps; Kate Brain; Kerenza Hood; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; C Lerman; B N Peshkin; C Hughes; D Main; C Isaacs; M D Schwartz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Degree of life-threat and differential use of coping modes.

Authors:  H Feifel; S Strack; V T Nagy
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time.

Authors:  Jean E Wylie; Ken R Smith; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 6.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Association between screening family medical history in general medical care and lower burden of cancer worry among women with a close family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert Gramling; David Anthony; Jan Lowery; Lori Ballinger; Deb Ma; Rana Habbal; Nancy Leighton; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact.

Authors:  A Fry; A Cull; S Appleton; R Rush; S Holloway; D Gorman; R Cetnarskyj; R Thomas; J Campbell; E Anderson; M Steel; M Porteous; H Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Margaret Charles; Melanie A Price
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-28

2.  "I have always believed I was at high risk..." The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  J Hilgart; C Phelps; P Bennett; K Hood; K Brain; A Murray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Limited impact on self-concept in individuals with Lynch syndrome; results from a national cohort study.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Mary Jane Esplen; Steen Ladelund; Inge Bernstein; Lone Sunde; Christina Carlsson; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  An online resource of digital stories about cancer genetics: qualitative study of patient preferences and information needs.

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Lisa Mundy; Jennifer Hilgart
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.