Literature DB >> 10925759

Falling through the cracks. Women's experiences of ineligibility for genetic testing for risk of breast cancer.

J L Bottorff1, L G Balneaves, J Buxton, P A Ratner, M McCullum, K Chalmers, T Hack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe experiences of women seeking information about their risk of hereditary breast cancer who fail to meet strict eligibility criteria for genetic counseling and testing.
DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study.
SETTING: Hereditary cancer program in western Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Women who had received notification of their ineligibility for referral for hereditary breast cancer risk assessment (n = 20) and some of their referring physicians (n = 10). Of 28 attempted contacts, five women had moved, one declined the invitation to participate, and two could not be interviewed because of scheduling conflicts. Ten of 20 physicians declined the invitation to participate.
METHOD: In-depth, open-ended telephone interviews were conducted. Transcribed interviews were systematically analyzed to identify salient themes. MAIN
FINDINGS: Three themes emerged. The first theme, "It's always on your mind," points to the profound concern about breast cancer that underlies women's experiences in seeking genetic testing. The second theme, "A test is a test," reflects women's beliefs that the test was relatively simple and similar to other medical tests in that it would provide a definitive answer. The third theme, "Falling through the cracks," captures the experience of ineligibility. Women reacted with a range of emotional responses and were left frustrated in their search for more specific information about their personal risk for breast cancer. Although women were encouraged to contact their physicians, few did.
CONCLUSION: These findings point to the psychological consequences in women who seek genetic testing for risk of breast cancer when they are told they are ineligible and they are not given adequate information and support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10925759      PMCID: PMC2144854     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  18 in total

1.  Risk perception, family history, and use of breast cancer screening tests.

Authors:  A P Polednak; D S Lane; M A Burg
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1991

Review 2.  A group therapy approach to facilitate integration of risk information for women at risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Esplen; B Toner; J Hunter; G Glendon; K Butler; B Field
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  An interactive computer program for educating and counseling patients about genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Green; N Fost
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Hereditary breast cancer. Identifying and managing BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

Authors:  R E Heisey; J C Carroll; E Warner; D R McCready; V Goel
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Hereditary breast cancer. Risk assessment of patients with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  E Warner; R E Heisey; V Goel; J C Carroll; D R McCready
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  DNA screening for breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility based on linked markers. A family study.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P Watson; T A Conway; J F Lynch; S M Slominski-Caster; S A Narod; J Feunteun; G Lenoir
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-13

7.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; M Boehnke; K Calzone; D S Markel; J E Garber; F S Collins; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; A Masny; A Balshem
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Women's receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  H Chaliki; S Loader; J C Levenkron; W Logan-Young; W J Hall; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Distress and psychosocial needs of a heterogeneous high risk familial cancer population.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John W Robinson; Peter Bridge; Francois P Bernier; Dawna M Gilchrist
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Clinical follow-up and breast and ovarian cancer screening of true BRCA1/2 noncarriers: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Sylvie Pelletier; Nora Wong; Zaki El Haffaf; William D Foulkes; Jocelyne Chiquette; Pavel Hamet; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Genetic counselling and the intention to undergo prophylactic mastectomy: effects of a breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S van Dijk; W Otten; M W Zoeteweij; D R M Timmermans; C J van Asperen; M H Breuning; R A E M Tollenaar; J Kievit
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.